Watts Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037240901 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,711 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
With a score of 9.9/10, tract 06037240901 in the Watts area of Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,711. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 33.9324, -118.2604 · click any tract to drill in
Why Watts scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Watts compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 88
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 99%Socioeconomic
- 80%Household composition
- 100%Racial/ethnic minority
- 34%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 96%Grade C
- 3%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Watts. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 35.2%Housing insecurity
- 17.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 44.8%Food insecurity
- 43.2%SNAP enrollment
- 21.2%Transit barriers
- 25.4%No health insurance
- 21.4%Frequent mental distress
- 43.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Watts
Food insecurity runs 44.8% against 17.8% nationally. The severe-burden share is 33%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10.
Housing insecurity runs 35.2% against 14.2% nationally. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, roughly two in three of renters here are cost-burdened.
Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Annualized rent equals 35% of average household income of $47,837, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.
The poverty rate is 29%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Average gross rent is $1,413, 27% below the Los Angeles average.
Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 06037240901
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037240901?
What is the average rent in tract 06037240901?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037240901?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037240901?
Is tract 06037240901 considered part of Watts?
What share of households in tract 06037240901 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037240901 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037240901 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.