Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #5,153 of 84,120 nationally

Watts Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037540700 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,066 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

06037540700 is a census tract in the Watts area of Willowbrook, CA. It scores 8.6/10 for landlords. It is home to 3,066 residents. What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.6/10.

Risk score
8.6
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 29% Stable renters 23% Owners 48%
Tract context
Occupied units958
Renter share52.5%
SVI overall0.98
Poverty rate9.1%
Median income$73,676

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#21 of 25 tracts In Watts
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 6 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within county
48 th percentile
Rank, 48th percentileLowHigh
#1,301 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Moderate
Within state
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#2,397 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 33.9255, -118.2453 · click any tract to drill in

Why Watts scores 8.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
9.1% poverty · this tract
2.3
Supply constraint
$1,659 rent vs county FMR
1.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
8.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
7.9

How Watts compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Watts risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.68.6This tracttract 540700Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 98

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Watts. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Watts

27% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.3/10.

Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.4/10. Housing insecurity runs 21.4% against 14.2% nationally. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

That is riskier than roughly 94% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.1 points hotter.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 56% of renters.

It tracks the Los Angeles County average of 8.4 closely. Average gross rent is $1,659, close to the Willowbrook average.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037540700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037540700?

Census tract 06037540700 in the Watts neighborhood scores 8.6/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037540700?

Median gross rent is $1,659/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037540700?

9.1% of residents in tract 06037540700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,066.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037540700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 98th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 91th, minority 98th, housing 89th.
Q5

Is tract 06037540700 considered part of Watts?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037540700 fall within Watts (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037540700 struggle to pay rent?

About 21.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037540700 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037540700 scores 8.6/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037540700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 35% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related