Within parent city
75
th percentile
High
Census Tract · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally
Los Angeles Eviction Risk: High
Tract 06037104703 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,298
With a score of 9.9/10, tract 06037104703 in Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,298 residents. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 30%
Stable renters 31%
Owners 39%
Tract context
Occupied units607
Renter share61.1%
SVI overall0.99
Poverty rate17.7%
Median income$47,981
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
99
th percentile
Very High
Within state
100
th percentile
Very High
National
100
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.2552, -118.4006 · click any tract to drill in
Why Los Angeles scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
17.7% poverty · this tract
4.4
Supply constraint
$1,831 rent vs county FMR
2.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0
How Los Angeles compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 99
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 95%Socioeconomic
- 92%Household composition
- 93%Racial/ethnic minority
- 99%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 29.4%Housing insecurity
- 12.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 35.8%Food insecurity
- 31.0%SNAP enrollment
- 16.4%Transit barriers
- 23.4%No health insurance
- 19.6%Frequent mental distress
- 38.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Los Angeles
The severe-burden share is 32%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Set annual rent against average income of $47,981 and the ratio lands at 46%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Housing insecurity runs 29.4% against 14.2% nationally.
It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. Adults with no health insurance runs 23.4% against 11.3% nationally.
Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, about half of renters here are cost-burdened. Nationally it ranks #1 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.
Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06037104703
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037104703?
Census tract 06037104703 in Los Angeles scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06037104703?
Median gross rent is $1,831/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037104703?
17.7% of residents in tract 06037104703 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,298.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037104703?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 99th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 92th, minority 93th, housing 99th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06037104703 struggle to pay rent?
About 29.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06037104703 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Tract 06037104703 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Pacoima
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Wilmington
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Raymer
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Toluca Lake
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Tarzana
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Mount Washington
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Virgil Village
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
New Chinatown
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Related