Within parent city
33
th percentile
Low
Census Tract · Ranked #18,163 of 84,120 nationally
Tract 06037460502 Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06037460502 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,771
Tract 06037460502 sits in Los Angeles County, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6/10. Population here is 4,771. 13% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well under the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%.
Risk score
6
Elevated
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units1,476
Renter share8.3%
SVI overall0.11
Poverty rate2.0%
Median income$250,001
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
10
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
23
th percentile
Low
National
78
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.2062, -118.1950 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 06037460502 scores 6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
State baseline
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
8.3
Rent control risk
State baseline
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0
How Tract 06037460502 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 11
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 6%Socioeconomic
- 27%Household composition
- 65%Racial/ethnic minority
- 14%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 89%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.1%Housing insecurity
- 2.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.6%Food insecurity
- 3.8%SNAP enrollment
- 3.5%Transit barriers
- 2.6%No health insurance
- 11.1%Frequent mental distress
- 19.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Tract 06037460502
It sits 2.4 points below the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. The voucher gap is 33.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
On the high side, supply constraint reads 8.3/10. Disability prevalence runs 19.4% against 31.5% nationally. 13% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Housing insecurity runs 5.1% against 14.2% nationally. Running hot, regional political climate reads 7.2/10.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 78% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 8% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
Social vulnerability reads 2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Rent consumes only 17% of average household income of $250,001, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.5 points cooler.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06037460502
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037460502?
Census tract 06037460502 in Los Angeles scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06037460502?
Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 13% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037460502?
2.0% of residents in tract 06037460502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,771.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037460502?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 11th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 6th, household 27th, minority 65th, housing 14th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06037460502 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
Was tract 06037460502 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related