Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #51,553 of 84,120 nationally

College Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Claremont

Tract 06037401801 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,467 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Eviction risk in the College Park neighborhood of Claremont centers on tract 06037401801, which scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 4,467 residents. That is riskier than roughly 47% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 27% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a moderate level, and 9% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,299 monthly, set against $158,189 in average yearly household income, roughly 17% of income at the averages. Renters make up 27% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 19% Owners 74%
Tract context
Occupied units1,591
Renter share26.5%
SVI overall0.22
Poverty rate2.6%
Median income$158,189

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In College Park
Very Low
Within parent city
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 9 tracts In Claremont
Very Low
Within county
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#2,410 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within state
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#7,921 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Claremont and the region

Centroid at 34.1146, -117.7081 · click any tract to drill in

Why College Park scores 3.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Claremont
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,299 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Claremont
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Claremont
7.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Claremont
5.9

How College Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
College Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.43.4This tracttract 401801Claremont: 8.08.0Claremontparent cityCounty: 6.76.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 22

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within College Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in College Park

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 8.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Claremont, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Los Angeles County average of 6.5 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 7.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of B ("Still Desirable"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037401801

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037401801?

Census tract 06037401801 in the College Park neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037401801?

Median gross rent is $2,299/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 27% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037401801?

2.6% of residents in tract 06037401801 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,467.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037401801?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 22th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 37th, minority 69th, housing 38th.
Q5

Is tract 06037401801 considered part of College Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037401801 fall within College Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037401801 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037401801 compare to Claremont overall?

Tract 06037401801 scores 3.4/10, lower than the parent city of Claremont at 8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Claremont; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037401801 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Claremont

Top eight tracts in Claremont ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related