Cambodia Town Eviction Risk: High , Long Beach
Tract 06037576904 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,970 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
Tract 06037576904 sits in the Cambodia Town area of Long Beach eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.9/10. 40% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Long Beach and the region
Centroid at 33.7772, -118.1573 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cambodia Town scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Cambodia Town compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 89
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 90%Socioeconomic
- 66%Household composition
- 80%Racial/ethnic minority
- 84%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 100%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Cambodia Town. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 24.2%Housing insecurity
- 12.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 29.2%Food insecurity
- 29.6%SNAP enrollment
- 14.9%Transit barriers
- 13.5%No health insurance
- 20.1%Frequent mental distress
- 34.6%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Cambodia Town
The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 9/10. 74% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 8.5/10.
Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10. SNAP participation runs 29.6% against 15.2% nationally.
Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points. Cost burden runs 61% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County. The poverty rate is 24%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.
Food insecurity runs 29.2% against 17.8% nationally. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Social vulnerability reads 9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037576904
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037576904?
What is the average rent in tract 06037576904?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037576904?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037576904?
Is tract 06037576904 considered part of Cambodia Town?
What share of households in tract 06037576904 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037576904 compare to Long Beach overall?
Was tract 06037576904 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Long Beach
Top eight tracts in Long Beach ranked by composite eviction-risk score.