Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #69,776 of 84,120 nationally
Rolling Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Rancho Palos Verdes
Tract 06037670201 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,625 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
Census tract 06037670201 runs through the Rolling Hills area of Rancho Palos Verdes. With 3,625 residents, it scores 5.7/10 for landlords. It lands near the 66th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
About 53% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 9% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $3,316 a month while the average household earns $191,063 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 20% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11%
Stable renters 10%
Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units1,410
Renter share20.3%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate2.0%
Median income$191,063
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
2
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Rancho Palos Verdes and the region
Centroid at 33.7792, -118.3368 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rolling Hills scores 2.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,316 rent vs county FMR
7.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
6.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
4.6
How Rolling Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 23
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 20%Socioeconomic
- 49%Household composition
- 52%Racial/ethnic minority
- 19%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Rolling Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.0%Housing insecurity
- 2.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.9%Food insecurity
- 5.5%SNAP enrollment
- 4.2%Transit barriers
- 3.2%No health insurance
- 11.9%Frequent mental distress
- 24.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Rolling Hills
What moves this score most is supply constraint at 7.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Los Angeles County average of 6.5 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 23rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 06037670201
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037670201?
Census tract 06037670201 in the Rolling Hills neighborhood scores 2.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06037670201?
Median gross rent is $3,316/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037670201?
2.0% of residents in tract 06037670201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,625.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037670201?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 49th, minority 52th, housing 19th.
Q5
Is tract 06037670201 considered part of Rolling Hills?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037670201 fall within Rolling Hills (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06037670201 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06037670201 compare to Rancho Palos Verdes overall?
Tract 06037670201 scores 2.3/10, lower than the parent city of Rancho Palos Verdes at 8.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 06037670201 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Rancho Palos Verdes
Top eight tracts in Rancho Palos Verdes ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related