Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #51,553 of 84,120 nationally
Rolling Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Rancho Palos Verdes
Tract 06037670500 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 1,451 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Census tract 06037670500 covers Rolling Hills in Rancho Palos Verdes, home to 1,451 residents. For landlords it grades 4.1/10, a moderate reading. On the national scale it ranks #71,915 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
About 11% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 11% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $3,501 a month against an average household income of $250,001 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. Renters make up 8% of occupied homes.
Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units583
Renter share7.7%
SVI overall0.07
Poverty rate7.3%
Median income$250,001
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
3
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
13
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Rancho Palos Verdes and the region
Centroid at 33.7600, -118.3472 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rolling Hills scores 3.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
7.3% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
8.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
1.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
3.0
How Rolling Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 7
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 7%Socioeconomic
- 59%Household composition
- 58%Racial/ethnic minority
- 2%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Rolling Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.0%Housing insecurity
- 2.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.7%Food insecurity
- 4.5%SNAP enrollment
- 3.8%Transit barriers
- 2.6%No health insurance
- 11.4%Frequent mental distress
- 24.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Rolling Hills
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 8.3/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well below the Los Angeles County average of 6.5 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 5.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 2.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 7th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 06037670500
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037670500?
Census tract 06037670500 in the Rolling Hills neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06037670500?
Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 11% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037670500?
7.3% of residents in tract 06037670500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,451.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037670500?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 7th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 59th, minority 58th, housing 2th.
Q5
Is tract 06037670500 considered part of Rolling Hills?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037670500 fall within Rolling Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06037670500 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06037670500 compare to Rancho Palos Verdes overall?
Tract 06037670500 scores 3.4/10, lower than the parent city of Rancho Palos Verdes at 8.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related