Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #41,206 of 84,120 nationally
Rolling Hills Eviction Risk: Moderate , Rancho Palos Verdes
Tract 06037670500 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 1,451 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
06037670500 is a census tract in the Rolling Hills area of Rolling Hills, CA. It scores 4.5/10 for landlords. It is home to 1,451 residents. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 11% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
4.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units583
Renter share7.7%
SVI overall0.07
Poverty rate7.3%
Median income$250,001
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
2
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Rancho Palos Verdes and the region
Centroid at 33.7600, -118.3472 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rolling Hills scores 4.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
7.3% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
8.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
1.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
3.0
How Rolling Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 7
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 7%Socioeconomic
- 59%Household composition
- 58%Racial/ethnic minority
- 2%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Rolling Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.0%Housing insecurity
- 2.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.7%Food insecurity
- 4.5%SNAP enrollment
- 3.8%Transit barriers
- 2.6%No health insurance
- 11.4%Frequent mental distress
- 24.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Rolling Hills
It sits 3.9 points below the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. The voucher gap is 33.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
The dominant input is supply constraint at 8.3/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.8/10.
Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.9/10. Severe burden reaches 11%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Adults with no health insurance runs 2.6% against 11.3% nationally.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 2.4% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. That is riskier than roughly 51% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Only 8% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.7/10.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 06037670500
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037670500?
Census tract 06037670500 in the Rolling Hills neighborhood scores 4.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06037670500?
Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 11% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037670500?
7.3% of residents in tract 06037670500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,451.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037670500?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 7th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 59th, minority 58th, housing 2th.
Q5
Is tract 06037670500 considered part of Rolling Hills?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037670500 fall within Rolling Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06037670500 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06037670500 compare to Rancho Palos Verdes overall?
Tract 06037670500 scores 4.5/10, lower than the parent city of Rancho Palos Verdes at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related