Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #23,808 of 84,120 nationally

Rolling Hills Eviction Risk: Moderate , Rancho Palos Verdes

Tract 06037670702 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 5,722 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

Census tract 06037670702 covers part of the Rolling Hills area of Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, and scores 5.5/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,722 residents. It sits 2.9 points below the Los Angeles County average of 8.4.

Risk score
5.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 3% Owners 93%
Tract context
Occupied units2,022
Renter share7.1%
SVI overall0.09
Poverty rate2.8%
Median income$203,039

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In Rolling Hills
Elevated
Within parent city
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 10 tracts In Rancho Palos Verdes
Very Low
Within county
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#2,414 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within state
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#7,883 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Rancho Palos Verdes and the region

Centroid at 33.7548, -118.3294 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rolling Hills scores 5.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
8.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
7.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
4.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes
4.9

How Rolling Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rolling Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.55.5This tracttract 670702Rancho Palos Verde: 6.96.9Rancho Palos Verdeparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 9

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rolling Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rolling Hills

The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10. The voucher gap is 33.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. 20% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Running hot, supply constraint reads 8.3/10. SNAP participation runs 4.9% against 15.2% nationally. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7.5/10.

59% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, higher than the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. Housing insecurity runs 6.0% against 14.2% nationally. This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

On the national scale it lands near the 72nd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 7% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037670702

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037670702?

Census tract 06037670702 in the Rolling Hills neighborhood scores 5.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037670702?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037670702?

2.8% of residents in tract 06037670702 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,722.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037670702?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 9th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 17th, minority 47th, housing 10th.
Q5

Is tract 06037670702 considered part of Rolling Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037670702 fall within Rolling Hills (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037670702 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037670702 compare to Rancho Palos Verdes overall?

Tract 06037670702 scores 5.5/10, lower than the parent city of Rancho Palos Verdes at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rancho Palos Verdes; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037670702 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Rancho Palos Verdes

Top eight tracts in Rancho Palos Verdes ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related