Lamanda Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Pasadena
Tract 06037464200 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 5,810 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi
With a score of 5.1/10, tract 06037464200 in the Lamanda Park area of San Marino, CA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,810. The severe-burden share is 38%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Pasadena and the region
Centroid at 34.1273, -118.0984 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lamanda Park scores 5.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Lamanda Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 25
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 19%Socioeconomic
- 60%Household composition
- 85%Racial/ethnic minority
- 11%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 85%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Lamanda Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 4.8%Housing insecurity
- 2.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.2%Food insecurity
- 3.7%SNAP enrollment
- 3.5%Transit barriers
- 2.5%No health insurance
- 9.3%Frequent mental distress
- 18.9%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Lamanda Park
It sits 3.3 points below the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1.1/10. The voucher gap is 33.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Running hot, supply constraint reads 8.3/10. 61% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, above the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%.
On the high side, local political climate reads 7.5/10. Housing insecurity runs 4.8% against 14.2% nationally.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 2.0% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 63rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
At 14% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points cooler.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06037464200
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037464200?
What is the average rent in tract 06037464200?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037464200?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037464200?
Is tract 06037464200 considered part of Lamanda Park?
What share of households in tract 06037464200 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037464200 compare to Pasadena overall?
Was tract 06037464200 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Pasadena
Top eight tracts in Pasadena ranked by composite eviction-risk score.