Madera County, California Eviction Risk: High
16 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of Madera (8.5) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.
Ranked #23 of 58 CA counties
132k residents · 16 cities · 34 tracts
Madera County eviction risk score history
Key metrics
-
Tenant beats landlord50.8%/ 100 outcomesIn court-decided eviction outcomes for Madera County, CA, tenants prevail in roughly 50.8% of contested cases. A higher number means landlords face stronger tenant defenses and longer calendars.
-
Timeline265dfiling → judgmentFrom the moment an unlawful-detainer notice is filed in Madera County, CA until a money judgment is entered, a contested eviction takes about 265 days on average. Longer timelines mean more lost rent for landlords.
-
Cost range$15.6–33.1klegal + lost rentA typical eviction in Madera County, CA costs landlords $15,565 to $33,105 all-in, covering court filing fees, process-server costs, attorney time, and lost rent.
-
Average rent$1,43835% stretched on rentAverage gross rent in Madera County, CA is $1,438 per month per the U.S. Census American Community Survey. 35% of renter households here spend more than 30% of pre-tax income on rent.
-
Renters35.2%of households35.2% of occupied housing units in Madera County, CA are renter-occupied. A higher renter share usually correlates with more eviction filings and a more active rental market.
-
Poverty21.2%10.5% unemp.21.2% of Madera County, CA residents live below the federal poverty line, and unemployment runs at 10.5%. Both feed the economic-stress sub-score in our Eviction Risk Score model.
Scrub 50 years
Madera County averages 8.1/10 across 16 cities, with scores ranging from 7.3 to 8.5; Big Creek, at 8.2/10, is the highest-risk city in the county. Ranked 37th of 58 California counties by eviction risk (rank 1 = highest risk), placing Madera County in the middle third of the state.
How Madera County ranks in California
Landlord guides for California
| City↕ | Population↕ | Risk↕ | % income on rent↕ | Average rent↕ | Lean↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Madera | 67,831 | 8.1 | 37.7% | $1,353 | Rep |
| 002 | Chowchilla | 19,020 | 8.5 | 30.6% | $1,178 | Rep |
| 003 | Madera Acres | 9,846 | 7.9 | 35.3% | $1,685 | Rep |
| 004 | Oakhurst | 6,091 | 7.6 | 28.9% | $1,728 | Rep |
| 005 | Bonadelle Ranchos | 5,465 | 7.5 | 24.4% | $1,941 | Rep |
| 006 | Yosemite Lakes | 5,288 | 7.7 | 34.8% | $1,907 | Rep |
| 007 | Coarsegold | 3,967 | 7.7 | 42.0% | $1,121 | Rep |
| 008 | Madera Ranchos | 3,037 | 8.0 | 47.5% | $1,612 | Rep |
| 009 | North Fork | 2,999 | 8.0 | 28.4% | $1,399 | Rep |
| 010 | Parksdale | 2,885 | 8.1 | 40.0% | $1,656 | Rep |
| 011 | Parkwood | 1,758 | 8.1 | 34.7% | $1,536 | Rep |
| 012 | Ahwahnee | 1,453 | 7.9 | 39.3% | $2,417 | Rep |
| 013 | Fairmead | 1,229 | 8.1 | 32.7% | $1,418 | Rep |
| 014 | Nipinnawasee | 558 | 7.3 | 25.7% | $1,338 | Rep |
| 015 | Bass Lake | 499 | 7.3 | 35.4% | $1,478 | Rep |
| 016 | Big Creek | 69 | 8.2 | 35.4% | $1,478 | Rep |
County heatmap
One county, multiple regulatory regimes.
Madera County, California eviction laws earns an average eviction-risk score of 8.1/10 (High) across its 16 incorporated places, putting it squarely in the middle third of the state: 36 California eviction laws counties carry higher risk and 21 are more landlord-friendly. For landlords and investors, that middle-tier reading does not mean uniformity. Average rent sits at $1,438 per month while average rent burden reaches 35.5% of renter income, a combination that strains tenant finances and lifts the probability of late payments and eviction proceedings. Poverty runs at 21.2% across the county, reinforcing that backdrop of financial stress.
At the county level the intra-county range, from 7.3 to 8.5, spans nearly a full point on a 10-point scale. That spread matters: a landlord with holdings in the county seat faces a meaningfully different operating environment than one with units in the smaller unincorporated communities to the north and east. Underwriting a portfolio as though all Madera County markets are equivalent is the kind of assumption that leads to mispriced vacancy risk. Because eviction proceedings in California eviction laws can drag on for months even when the law is on the landlord's side, this is precisely why working with a professional property manager who knows local court practices and tenant patterns is worth the cost.
The cities inside Madera County
The highest-risk location in the county is Big Creek at 8.2/10, the only city to reach that score. Clustered just behind it at 6.3/10 are Chowchilla (population 19,020), Parksdale, Parkwood, and Fairmead. Chowchilla is the second-largest city in the county and carries an elevated score that investors should weigh carefully against any yield projections. Ahwahnee comes in at 7.9/10, followed by a group including Madera Acres (population 9,846) and Oakhurst (population 6,091), each at 7.6/10.
The city of Madera itself, the county seat with a population of 67,831, is the lowest-scoring major market at 5.6/10, still Elevated but notably more landlord-friendly than the smaller communities around it. Risk in this county is genuinely hyper-local: two cities in the same county can differ by nearly a full point, which should drive city-level due diligence rather than county-level assumptions.
State-level laws that apply here
Every landlord operating in Madera County is subject to California eviction laws state law, and that framework is one of the more layered in the country. For non-payment of rent, a curable lease violation, or an incurable violation such as nuisance or substantial damage, the required notice period is just 3 days (CCP § 1161). No-cause terminations require 30 days for tenancies under one year and 60 days for tenancies of one year or more (Civ. Code § 1946.1). Under AB 1482, most multi-unit properties built before 2005 are subject to a rent cap of 5% plus CPI, max 10% annually, and just cause is required for eviction after 12 months of tenancy. Understanding the full California eviction laws eviction process, including the distinction between uncontested timelines of 35 to 60 days and contested matters that can run 75 to 180 days, is essential before acquiring any rental here.
On the cost side, court filing fees run $240 to $435, sheriff lockout fees add $75 to $145, and attorney fees for a contested case typically range from $1,500 to $4,500. California eviction costs can therefore reach well into four figures before a lockout order is executed. Landlords should also note that California security deposit limits and tenant protections around source-of-income discrimination (Gov Code § 12927) add further compliance obligations that are easy to overlook without experienced local guidance.
With 35.2% of county residents renting and a poverty rate of 21.2%, the financial fragility in Madera County is concentrated enough to influence default rates across a wide range of price points; review the city grid above to identify which specific markets fall above or below the county average of 8.1/10.
Historical eviction filings in Madera County
From 2010 to 2017, eviction filings in Madera County declined 45%. The peak was 701 filings in 2010.1
- 7012010
- 701Peak (2010)
- 3862017
Data covers 2000–2018, the full span of the Princeton Eviction Lab's national county court-records dataset.
How Madera County compares
Madera County's average eviction-risk score of 8.1/10 (High) ranks it 37th of 58 California counties, where rank 1 is the highest-risk. Among its peer counties, Imperial County is notably riskier at 6.09/10, while Yolo County (5.81/10), Placer County (5.88/10), Sutter County (5.91/10), and Shasta County (5.92/10) all score higher than Madera, meaning Madera is marginally more landlord-favorable than each of those peers.
Within the county itself, the spread from 5.6 (Madera city) to 6.4 (Big Creek) is 0.8 points, indicating that sub-county asset selection matters: an investor choosing the city of Madera over Big Creek is effectively operating in a materially lower-risk environment despite being in the same county.