Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #19,618 of 84,120 nationally

Lincoln/Glassell Eviction Risk: Moderate , Anaheim

Tract 06059086305 · Orange, CA · pop 4,691 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

With a score of 5.9/10, tract 06059086305 in the Lincoln/Glassell area of Anaheim, CA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,691 residents. Average gross rent is $3,501, 61% above the Anaheim average.

Risk score
5.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 7% Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units1,133
Renter share13.7%
SVI overall0.50
Poverty rate4.5%
Median income$150,341

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 6 tracts In Lincoln/Glassell
Very Low
Within parent city
5 th percentile
Rank, 5th percentileLowHigh
#58 of 61 tracts In Anaheim
Very Low
Within county
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#483 of 613 tracts In Orange
Low
Within state
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#7,225 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Anaheim and the region

Centroid at 33.8291, -117.8795 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lincoln/Glassell scores 5.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Anaheim
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.5% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
7.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Anaheim
6.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Anaheim
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Anaheim
7.0

How Lincoln/Glassell compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lincoln/Glassell risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.9This tracttract 0863057.1Anaheimparent city7.0Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 50

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lincoln/Glassell. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lincoln/Glassell

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.1/10. The severe-burden share is 26%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

The voucher gap is 20.6%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. It sits 1.1 points below the Orange County average of 7.0. Sitting well above the midpoint, supply constraint reads 7.1/10.

Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 7/10. On the national scale it lands near the 77th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Only 14% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.5/10.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.6 points cooler. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 52% of renters.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06059086305

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06059086305?

Census tract 06059086305 in the Lincoln/Glassell neighborhood scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06059086305?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06059086305?

4.5% of residents in tract 06059086305 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,691.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06059086305?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 50th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 56th, household 29th, minority 81th, housing 38th.
Q5

Is tract 06059086305 considered part of Lincoln/Glassell?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06059086305 fall within Lincoln/Glassell (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06059086305 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06059086305 compare to Anaheim overall?

Tract 06059086305 scores 5.9/10, lower than the parent city of Anaheim at 7.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Anaheim eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Anaheim

Top eight tracts in Anaheim ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related