6 census tracts · pop 28,092 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 7/10
· range 5.9–8.4
Lincoln/Glassell spans 6 census tracts of Anaheim, CA and houses 28,092 people. It carries an Eviction Risk Score of 7/10, in the Elevated tier. 58% of renters here are cost-burdened at the 30% threshold, well clear of the Anaheim rate of 35.9%.
The 6 tracts inside this boundary do not behave alike. Individual scores run 5.9 to 8.4, a 2.5-point gap wide enough that the area average misleads on any specific address. 24% are severely burdened, paying half their income or more in rent. That cohort has no absorption capacity for an unexpected bill, and it is where non-payment filings originate. The main counterweight is economic stress, at 2.1/10.
At $2,521 a month, rents sit 16% over what the rest of Anaheim commands. Among the 7 mapped neighborhoods of Anaheim, it ranks #5 by risk, the lower third.
For a like-for-like read, Anaheim Resort District and Fairlynn score within a fraction of it. Annual rent works out to 28% of average household income of $107,612.
46% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Underwrite the address, not the area: with 2.5 points between its best and worst tract, the per-tract table below is the operative number. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.
Risk score
7
Elevated
6 tracts · population-weighted
Lincoln/Glassell vs AnaheimHow this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority81%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport77%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted
Eviction-adjacent indicators in Lincoln/Glassell
Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.
15.4%Housing insecurity
7.1%Utility shutoff threat
17.7%Food insecurity
13.6%SNAP enrollment
11.9%No health insurance
28.0%Any disability
Frequently asked
About Lincoln/Glassell
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for Lincoln/Glassell?
Lincoln/Glassell scores 7/10 (Elevated tier) across 6 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2
How does Lincoln/Glassell compare to Anaheim overall?
Lincoln/Glassell scores 0.1 points lower than Anaheim overall (7.1/10). Renters spend 58% of income on rent vs 36% citywide. Average rent: $2,521 vs $2,175.
Q3
What is the average rent in Lincoln/Glassell?
Average gross rent in Lincoln/Glassell is $2,521/month (pop-weighted across 6 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4
What percentage of Lincoln/Glassell residents are renters?
46% of Lincoln/Glassell households are renter-occupied (vs 54% in Anaheim). The neighborhood has 28,092 residents.
Q5
Is Lincoln/Glassell a high social-vulnerability area?
Lincoln/Glassell sits in the 65th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (moderately vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6
Which tracts in Lincoln/Glassell have the highest eviction risk?
The highest-risk constituent tract in Lincoln/Glassell is census tract 06059086406 (score 8.4/10). Across the 6 tracts in this neighborhood the score ranges from 5.9 to 8.4, a spread of 2.5 points.
Q7
How safe is Lincoln/Glassell for landlords?
Lincoln/Glassell carries a elevated-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (7/10). Pop-weighted across 6 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Anaheim as a whole (7.1/10), this neighborhood is in line with the citywide level.
Q8
What is the demographic breakdown of Lincoln/Glassell?
Lincoln/Glassell has 28,101 residents. Top groups: Hispanic / Latino (50.1%), White (non-Hispanic) (26.4%), Asian (non-Hispanic) (16%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
