With a score of 7.9/10, tract 06061020715 in Roseville, CA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,023 residents. Severe burden reaches 43%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
7.9
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25%Stable renters 10%Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units1,150
Renter share34.4%
SVI overall0.59
Poverty rate14.1%
Median income$90,343
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
90th percentile
#4 of 31 tracts In Roseville
Very High
Within county
92th percentile
#8 of 92 tracts In Placer
Very High
Within state
59th percentile
#3,732 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
National
90th percentile
#8,653 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Roseville and the region
Centroid at 38.7238, -121.2544 · click any tract to drill in
Why Roseville scores 7.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Roseville
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.7
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
14.1% poverty · this tract
3.5
Supply constraint
$1,943 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Roseville
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Roseville
6.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Roseville
5.6
How Roseville compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 59
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
11.9%Housing insecurity
6.7%Utility-shutoff threat
14.0%Food insecurity
13.6%SNAP enrollment
8.1%Transit barriers
7.4%No health insurance
18.1%Frequent mental distress
31.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Roseville
72% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far above the Placer County average of 50.5%. Against the Placer County average of 6.2, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.7 points. The main counterweight is court filing pressure at 2.2/10.
On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.6/10. Average gross rent is $1,943, 9% below the Roseville average.
On the national scale it lands near the 90th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 6.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. Annual rent works out to 26% of average household income of $90,343. 34% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 06061020715
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06061020715?
Census tract 06061020715 in Roseville scores 7.9/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06061020715?
Median gross rent is $1,943/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 72% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06061020715?
14.1% of residents in tract 06061020715 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,023.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06061020715?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 59th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 59th, household 75th, minority 42th, housing 41th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06061020715 struggle to pay rent?
About 11.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06061020715 compare to Roseville overall?
Tract 06061020715 scores 7.9/10, higher than the parent city of Roseville at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Roseville eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Roseville
Top eight tracts in Roseville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.