Census Tract · Ranked #12,481 of 84,120 nationally
Roseville Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06061021039 ·
Placer, CA · pop 1,542
Tract 06061021039 sits in Roseville eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 7.1/10. Population here is 1,542. Against Placer County at 50.5%, 89% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
7.1
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7%Stable renters 1%Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units933
Renter share8.0%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate5.1%
Median income$83,583
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
73th percentile
#9 of 31 tracts In Roseville
Elevated
Within county
77th percentile
#22 of 92 tracts In Placer
High
Within state
44th percentile
#5,095 of 9,109 tracts In California
Moderate
National
85th percentile
#12,481 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Roseville and the region
Centroid at 38.7846, -121.3521 · click any tract to drill in
Why Roseville scores 7.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Roseville
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.7
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.1% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$2,462 rent vs county FMR
6.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Roseville
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Roseville
6.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Roseville
5.6
How Roseville compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 3
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
3.0%Housing insecurity
1.8%Utility-shutoff threat
5.0%Food insecurity
4.7%SNAP enrollment
3.2%Transit barriers
3.6%No health insurance
8.5%Frequent mental distress
40.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Roseville
Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.3/10. Set annual rent against average income of $83,583 and the ratio lands at 35%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
19% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Well under the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 2.2/10. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.6/10.
SNAP participation runs 4.7% against 15.2% nationally. It sits 0.9 points above the Placer County average of 6.2.
Average gross rent is $2,462, 15% above the Roseville average. Adults with no health insurance runs 3.6% against 11.3% nationally.
That is riskier than roughly 85% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 8% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06061021039
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06061021039?
Census tract 06061021039 in Roseville scores 7.1/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06061021039?
Median gross rent is $2,462/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 89% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06061021039?
5.1% of residents in tract 06061021039 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,542.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06061021039?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 21th, minority 18th, housing 6th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06061021039 struggle to pay rent?
About 3.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 1.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06061021039 compare to Roseville overall?
Tract 06061021039 scores 7.1/10, higher than the parent city of Roseville at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Roseville eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Roseville
Top eight tracts in Roseville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.