Plumas County, California Eviction Risk: High
34 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of East Quincy (7.8) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.
Ranked #50 of 58 CA counties
13k residents · 34 cities · 7 tracts
Plumas County eviction risk score history
Key metrics
-
Tenant beats landlord47.2%/ 100 outcomesIn court-decided eviction outcomes for Plumas County, CA, tenants prevail in roughly 47.2% of contested cases. A higher number means landlords face stronger tenant defenses and longer calendars.
-
Timeline264dfiling → judgmentFrom the moment an unlawful-detainer notice is filed in Plumas County, CA until a money judgment is entered, a contested eviction takes about 264 days on average. Longer timelines mean more lost rent for landlords.
-
Cost range$15.1–35.6klegal + lost rentA typical eviction in Plumas County, CA costs landlords $15,095 to $35,583 all-in, covering court filing fees, process-server costs, attorney time, and lost rent.
-
Average rent$1,21738% stretched on rentAverage gross rent in Plumas County, CA is $1,217 per month per the U.S. Census American Community Survey. 38% of renter households here spend more than 30% of pre-tax income on rent.
-
Renters30.2%of households30.2% of occupied housing units in Plumas County, CA are renter-occupied. A higher renter share usually correlates with more eviction filings and a more active rental market.
-
Poverty13.7%9.8% unemp.13.7% of Plumas County, CA residents live below the federal poverty line, and unemployment runs at 9.8%. Both feed the economic-stress sub-score in our Eviction Risk Score model.
Scrub 50 years
Plumas County's average eviction-risk score of 7.3/10 spans a range of 6.6 to 7.8 across its 34 tracked cities, with Portola anchoring the high end at 7.8/10. Ranked 42nd of 58 California counties, Plumas County sits in the lower-risk third of the state.
How Plumas County ranks in California
Landlord guides for California
| City↕ | Population↕ | Risk↕ | % income on rent↕ | Average rent↕ | Lean↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | East Quincy | 2,723 | 7.1 | 39.5% | $1,681 | Rep |
| 002 | Portola | 2,441 | 7.8 | 31.5% | $819 | Rep |
| 003 | Chester | 1,759 | 7.0 | 41.8% | $1,110 | Rep |
| 004 | Quincy | 1,317 | 7.8 | 31.1% | $1,026 | Rep |
| 005 | Graeagle | 496 | 6.9 | 16.8% | $2,032 | Rep |
| 006 | Hamilton Branch | 480 | 6.8 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 007 | Lake Almanor Country Club | 469 | 7.7 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 008 | Lake Almanor West | 463 | 6.7 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 009 | Greenville | 424 | 6.9 | 51.0% | $296 | Rep |
| 010 | Lake Almanor Peninsula | 412 | 7.3 | 42.5% | $1,139 | Rep |
| 011 | Plumas Eureka | 372 | 7.4 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 012 | Meadow Valley | 363 | 6.8 | 40.7% | $1,168 | Rep |
| 013 | Greenhorn | 243 | 6.8 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 014 | Clear Creek | 172 | 6.8 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 015 | Cromberg | 154 | 7.6 | 90.2% | $2,107 | Rep |
| 016 | Milford | 147 | 7.2 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 017 | East Shore | 142 | 7.5 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 018 | Taylorsville | 123 | 7.4 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 019 | Indian Falls | 79 | 7.1 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 020 | Crescent Mills | 63 | 6.8 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 021 | Prattville | 57 | 7.4 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 022 | La Porte | 53 | 6.8 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 023 | Keddie | 48 | 6.7 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 024 | Twain | 31 | 7.6 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 025 | Johnsville | 22 | 6.9 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 026 | Bucks Lake | 20 | 6.9 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 027 | Spring Garden | 19 | 7.2 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 028 | Belden | 15 | 7.1 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 029 | Canyondam | 11 | 6.6 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 030 | Little Grass Valley | 10 | 6.9 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 031 | Warner Valley | 8 | 7.3 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 032 | Almanor | 3 | 7.0 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 033 | Caribou | 1 | 7.0 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
| 034 | Paxton | 7.2 | 40.9% | $1,234 | Rep |
County heatmap
One county, multiple regulatory regimes.
Plumas County scores 7.3/10 (High) on the EvictionRiskMap scale, which puts it in a notable position for landlords operating in California: 41 of the state's 58 counties carry higher risk scores, placing Plumas in the lower-risk third statewide. That said, an Elevated rating still signals real friction, and the county's 34 tracked cities span a range of 6.6 to 7.8, meaning the difference between your chosen submarket and a neighboring town can shift your effective operating environment meaningfully.
With a total population of roughly 13,140 and an average rent of $1,217, Plumas is a thin, rural market. Just 30.2% of residents rent, so vacancy exposure and tenant turnover dynamics differ sharply from dense urban California eviction laws counties. Rent burden averages 38% of income, a figure that tracks closely with elevated delinquency risk during any income disruption, even in markets that look low-risk on other dimensions. Wise positioning inside the county matters more than the county average alone suggests. This is precisely the kind of environment where working with a professional property manager, who knows local vacancy patterns and tenant screening norms, can protect returns that a remote self-manager would erode.
The cities inside Plumas County
The riskiest submarket in the county is Portola, which scores 7.8/10. With a population of 2,441, Portola is the county's second-largest city and its highest-risk one, a combination that concentrates landlord exposure. Chester follows at 7/10 with 1,759 residents, and Keddie and Twain each come in at 6.7/10. These four communities represent the elevated-friction tier within an already Elevated-rated county, where tenant protections, local economic stress, and case-management timelines compound each other.
On the lower end of the county's range, Graeagle scores 6.9/10, and Lake Almanor Country Club and Lake Almanor West each come in at 7.7/10. East Quincy, the county's largest city at 2,723 residents, sits exactly at the county average of 7.3/10. Quincy (7.8/10, population 1,317) occupies a middle position. The point is simple: a one-point spread across a single county is enough to materially alter your risk profile, so city-level due diligence is not optional in Plumas.
State-level laws that apply here
Every property in Plumas County operates under California eviction laws state law, which imposes a layered set of landlord obligations. For non-payment of rent, a curable lease violation, or an incurable violation such as nuisance or substantial damage, California eviction laws requires a 3-day notice before filing (CCP § 1161). No-cause terminations require 30 days notice for tenancies under one year or 60 days for tenancies of one year or more (Civ. Code § 1946.1). Under AB 1482, just cause is required to terminate most tenancies (CA Civil Code § 1946.2), and rent increases are capped at 5% plus CPI, maximum 10% (Cal. Civ. Code § 1947.12). Understanding the full California eviction laws eviction process before you act is essential, because procedural missteps restart the clock entirely.
On the cost side, the California eviction costs landlords face in a contested case are substantial. Court filing fees run $240 to $435, sheriff lockout fees add $75 to $145, and attorney fees typically range from $1,500 to $4,500. An uncontested case resolves in 35 to 60 days, while a contested matter can stretch to 75 to 180 days. California security deposit limits and California tenant protections under the Civil Rights Department (CRD) also apply statewide, including source-of-income protections and restrictions on blanket criminal-history bans under FEHA. Landlords unfamiliar with these rules should review them before placing a tenant in any Plumas County property.
With a poverty rate of 13.7% and only 30.2% of the county renting, Plumas County is a small, economically constrained rental market; the city-by-city grid above shows where within that market the risk concentrations actually sit.
Historical eviction filings in Plumas County
From 2010 to 2017, eviction filings in Plumas County declined 17%. The peak was 69 filings in 2011.1
- 542010
- 69Peak (2011)
- 452017
Data covers 2000–2018, the full span of the Princeton Eviction Lab's national county court-records dataset.
How Plumas County compares
Among comparable rural California eviction laws counties, Plumas County's average eviction-risk score of 7.3/10 sits below Colusa County (5.86/10), Siskiyou County (5.82/10), and Tuolumne County (5.73/10), while edging above Calaveras County (5.43/10) and Trinity County (5.34/10). Statewide, Plumas County ranks 42nd of 58 California counties on eviction risk, meaning 41 counties carry more risk and only 16 are less risky, placing it in the lower-risk third of California eviction laws markets.