Skip to content
Map of Plumas County, CA eviction risk by city, county average 5.6 out of 10
County brief·Updated July 27, 2026

Plumas County, California Eviction Risk: High

34 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of East Quincy (7.8) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.

In 2026
Risk score
7.3
HIGH

Ranked #50 of 58 CA counties

13k residents · 34 cities · 7 tracts

1976–2026 · pop-weighted from cities

Plumas County eviction risk score history

Min2.5 Average4.0 Now7.3
10 5 1976 · score 2.6 1977 · score 2.6 1978 · score 2.5 1979 · score 2.5 1980 · score 2.5 1981 · score 2.6 1982 · score 2.8 1983 · score 2.7 1984 · score 2.6 1985 · score 2.6 1986 · score 2.5 1987 · score 2.5 1988 · score 2.5 1989 · score 2.5 1990 · score 2.6 1991 · score 2.7 1992 · score 3.2 1993 · score 3.2 1994 · score 3.2 1995 · score 3.1 1996 · score 3.1 1997 · score 3.1 1998 · score 3.1 1999 · score 3.1 2000 · score 3.1 2001 · score 3.2 2002 · score 3.3 2003 · score 3.4 2004 · score 3.5 2005 · score 3.5 2006 · score 3.5 2007 · score 3.6 2008 · score 4.4 2009 · score 4.6 2010 · score 4.7 2011 · score 4.8 2012 · score 4.8 2013 · score 4.7 2014 · score 4.7 2015 · score 4.7 2016 · score 4.7 2017 · score 4.8 2018 · score 5.0 2019 · score 5.8 2020 · score 8.0 2021 · score 7.8 2022 · score 7.5 2023 · score 7.2 2024 · score 7.4 2025 · score 7.3 2026 · score 7.3

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Plumas County's average eviction-risk score of 7.3/10 spans a range of 6.6 to 7.8 across its 34 tracked cities, with Portola anchoring the high end at 7.8/10. Ranked 42nd of 58 California counties, Plumas County sits in the lower-risk third of the state.

How Plumas County ranks in California

Lower number means more extreme, where #1 is the most
Eviction Risk Score
Very Low
#50 of 58 CA counties 7.3 / 10
Eviction Risk Score, 14th percentileLowHigh
#50 of 58 counties in California for landlord eviction risk.
Cost of living
Very High
#1 of 51 states (statewide) 110.7 index
Cost of living, 100th percentileLowHigh
California ranks #1 of 51 states on overall cost of living (10.7% more expensive than the U.S. avg).
Housing services cost
Very High
#2 of 51 states (statewide) 154.3 index
Housing services cost, 98th percentileLowHigh
California ranks #2 of 51 states on housing services (54.3% more expensive than the U.S. avg).
Income spent on rent
Very High
#1 of 58 CA counties 41.4% of income
Income spent on rent, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 58 counties in California on % of income spent on rent.

Landlord guides for California

State-specific playbooks
California Eviction Costs →
Filing fees, attorney fees, lost rent, sheriff lockout
California Eviction Process →
Step-by-step timeline, notices, statute cites
California Rent Control →
Statewide caps, local ordinances, just-cause
California Tenant Screening →
Five-point protocol, legal rules, protected classes
California Tenant Protections →
Just cause, retaliation, habitability, entry
Cities in Plumas County
Sorted by Eviction Risk Score · highest first
Map view
CityPopulationRisk% income on rentAverage rentLean
001 East Quincy Pop 2,723 · 39.5% income · $1,681 rent · Rep 2,723 7.1 39.5% $1,681 Rep
002 Portola Pop 2,441 · 31.5% income · $819 rent · Rep 2,441 7.8 31.5% $819 Rep
003 Chester Pop 1,759 · 41.8% income · $1,110 rent · Rep 1,759 7.0 41.8% $1,110 Rep
004 Quincy Pop 1,317 · 31.1% income · $1,026 rent · Rep 1,317 7.8 31.1% $1,026 Rep
005 Graeagle Pop 496 · 16.8% income · $2,032 rent · Rep 496 6.9 16.8% $2,032 Rep
006 Hamilton Branch Pop 480 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 480 6.8 40.9% $1,234 Rep
007 Lake Almanor Country Club Pop 469 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 469 7.7 40.9% $1,234 Rep
008 Lake Almanor West Pop 463 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 463 6.7 40.9% $1,234 Rep
009 Greenville Pop 424 · 51.0% income · $296 rent · Rep 424 6.9 51.0% $296 Rep
010 Lake Almanor Peninsula Pop 412 · 42.5% income · $1,139 rent · Rep 412 7.3 42.5% $1,139 Rep
011 Plumas Eureka Pop 372 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 372 7.4 40.9% $1,234 Rep
012 Meadow Valley Pop 363 · 40.7% income · $1,168 rent · Rep 363 6.8 40.7% $1,168 Rep
013 Greenhorn Pop 243 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 243 6.8 40.9% $1,234 Rep
014 Clear Creek Pop 172 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 172 6.8 40.9% $1,234 Rep
015 Cromberg Pop 154 · 90.2% income · $2,107 rent · Rep 154 7.6 90.2% $2,107 Rep
016 Milford Pop 147 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 147 7.2 40.9% $1,234 Rep
017 East Shore Pop 142 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 142 7.5 40.9% $1,234 Rep
018 Taylorsville Pop 123 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 123 7.4 40.9% $1,234 Rep
019 Indian Falls Pop 79 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 79 7.1 40.9% $1,234 Rep
020 Crescent Mills Pop 63 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 63 6.8 40.9% $1,234 Rep
021 Prattville Pop 57 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 57 7.4 40.9% $1,234 Rep
022 La Porte Pop 53 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 53 6.8 40.9% $1,234 Rep
023 Keddie Pop 48 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 48 6.7 40.9% $1,234 Rep
024 Twain Pop 31 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 31 7.6 40.9% $1,234 Rep
025 Johnsville Pop 22 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 22 6.9 40.9% $1,234 Rep
026 Bucks Lake Pop 20 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 20 6.9 40.9% $1,234 Rep
027 Spring Garden Pop 19 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 19 7.2 40.9% $1,234 Rep
028 Belden Pop 15 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 15 7.1 40.9% $1,234 Rep
029 Canyondam Pop 11 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 11 6.6 40.9% $1,234 Rep
030 Little Grass Valley Pop 10 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 10 6.9 40.9% $1,234 Rep
031 Warner Valley Pop 8 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 8 7.3 40.9% $1,234 Rep
032 Almanor Pop 3 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 3 7.0 40.9% $1,234 Rep
033 Caribou Pop 1 · 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 1 7.0 40.9% $1,234 Rep
034 Paxton 40.9% income · $1,234 rent · Rep 7.2 40.9% $1,234 Rep

County heatmap

Geographic distribution
Local landlord context

One county, multiple regulatory regimes.

Plumas County scores 7.3/10 (High) on the EvictionRiskMap scale, which puts it in a notable position for landlords operating in California: 41 of the state's 58 counties carry higher risk scores, placing Plumas in the lower-risk third statewide. That said, an Elevated rating still signals real friction, and the county's 34 tracked cities span a range of 6.6 to 7.8, meaning the difference between your chosen submarket and a neighboring town can shift your effective operating environment meaningfully.

With a total population of roughly 13,140 and an average rent of $1,217, Plumas is a thin, rural market. Just 30.2% of residents rent, so vacancy exposure and tenant turnover dynamics differ sharply from dense urban California eviction laws counties. Rent burden averages 38% of income, a figure that tracks closely with elevated delinquency risk during any income disruption, even in markets that look low-risk on other dimensions. Wise positioning inside the county matters more than the county average alone suggests. This is precisely the kind of environment where working with a professional property manager, who knows local vacancy patterns and tenant screening norms, can protect returns that a remote self-manager would erode.

The cities inside Plumas County

The riskiest submarket in the county is Portola, which scores 7.8/10. With a population of 2,441, Portola is the county's second-largest city and its highest-risk one, a combination that concentrates landlord exposure. Chester follows at 7/10 with 1,759 residents, and Keddie and Twain each come in at 6.7/10. These four communities represent the elevated-friction tier within an already Elevated-rated county, where tenant protections, local economic stress, and case-management timelines compound each other.

On the lower end of the county's range, Graeagle scores 6.9/10, and Lake Almanor Country Club and Lake Almanor West each come in at 7.7/10. East Quincy, the county's largest city at 2,723 residents, sits exactly at the county average of 7.3/10. Quincy (7.8/10, population 1,317) occupies a middle position. The point is simple: a one-point spread across a single county is enough to materially alter your risk profile, so city-level due diligence is not optional in Plumas.

State-level laws that apply here

Every property in Plumas County operates under California eviction laws state law, which imposes a layered set of landlord obligations. For non-payment of rent, a curable lease violation, or an incurable violation such as nuisance or substantial damage, California eviction laws requires a 3-day notice before filing (CCP § 1161). No-cause terminations require 30 days notice for tenancies under one year or 60 days for tenancies of one year or more (Civ. Code § 1946.1). Under AB 1482, just cause is required to terminate most tenancies (CA Civil Code § 1946.2), and rent increases are capped at 5% plus CPI, maximum 10% (Cal. Civ. Code § 1947.12). Understanding the full California eviction laws eviction process before you act is essential, because procedural missteps restart the clock entirely.

On the cost side, the California eviction costs landlords face in a contested case are substantial. Court filing fees run $240 to $435, sheriff lockout fees add $75 to $145, and attorney fees typically range from $1,500 to $4,500. An uncontested case resolves in 35 to 60 days, while a contested matter can stretch to 75 to 180 days. California security deposit limits and California tenant protections under the Civil Rights Department (CRD) also apply statewide, including source-of-income protections and restrictions on blanket criminal-history bans under FEHA. Landlords unfamiliar with these rules should review them before placing a tenant in any Plumas County property.

With a poverty rate of 13.7% and only 30.2% of the county renting, Plumas County is a small, economically constrained rental market; the city-by-city grid above shows where within that market the risk concentrations actually sit.

Historical eviction filings in Plumas County

From 2010 to 2017, eviction filings in Plumas County declined 17%. The peak was 69 filings in 2011.1

Annual filings 2010–2017 No filing data published after 2018
Annual eviction filings in Plumas County 2000-2018 (Eviction Lab)2010: 54 filings2011: 69 filings2012: 61 filings2013: 68 filings2014: 52 filings2015: 51 filings2016: 60 filings2017: 45 filings

Data covers 2000–2018, the full span of the Princeton Eviction Lab's national county court-records dataset.

How Plumas County compares

Among comparable rural California eviction laws counties, Plumas County's average eviction-risk score of 7.3/10 sits below Colusa County (5.86/10), Siskiyou County (5.82/10), and Tuolumne County (5.73/10), while edging above Calaveras County (5.43/10) and Trinity County (5.34/10). Statewide, Plumas County ranks 42nd of 58 California counties on eviction risk, meaning 41 counties carry more risk and only 16 are less risky, placing it in the lower-risk third of California eviction laws markets.

Peer counties in California

Same state, closest by population and Eviction Risk Score
Peer county
Del Norte County eviction risk
7.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Pop. 12.2K
Peer county
Trinity County eviction risk
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Pop. 12.9K
Peer county
Inyo County eviction risk
7.4
/ 10 · Elevated
Pop. 12.9K
Peer county
Calaveras County eviction risk
7.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Pop. 28.1K

Where eviction risk concentrates in Plumas County

Top cities + top neighborhoods · click any card for the full breakdown

Top cities by population

Frequently asked

Frequently asked questions about Plumas County

Q1

How is the Plumas County eviction risk score computed?

Each of the 34 cities in the county is independently scored on nine sub-factors. The county-wide 7.3/10 average reflects a population-weighted mean of those municipal scores.
Q2

Does Plumas County have rent control?

Rent control is determined by state law and city ordinance. California state framework applies. See the California eviction laws rent-control guide for details.
Q3

What is the political climate in Plumas County?

Plumas County voted Republican by 16.7 points in 2020.