Skip to content
Clear Creek, California eviction risk overview
City brief · 172 residents

Clear Creek, CA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Plumas County · Population 172

In 2026
Risk score
6.8
ELEVATED

3th percentile, California.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.3 Average3.8 Now6.8
7.8 2.3 1976 · score 2.5 1977 · score 2.4 1978 · score 2.4 1979 · score 2.4 1980 · score 2.4 1981 · score 2.5 1982 · score 2.6 1983 · score 2.6 1984 · score 2.5 1985 · score 2.5 1986 · score 2.4 1987 · score 2.3 1988 · score 2.4 1989 · score 2.4 1990 · score 2.5 1991 · score 2.6 1992 · score 3.0 1993 · score 3.1 1994 · score 3.1 1995 · score 2.9 1996 · score 2.9 1997 · score 2.9 1998 · score 2.9 1999 · score 3.0 2000 · score 2.9 2001 · score 3.0 2002 · score 3.1 2003 · score 3.2 2004 · score 3.3 2005 · score 3.3 2006 · score 3.3 2007 · score 3.4 2008 · score 4.2 2009 · score 4.4 2010 · score 4.5 2011 · score 4.6 2012 · score 4.6 2013 · score 4.5 2014 · score 4.5 2015 · score 4.5 2016 · score 4.5 2017 · score 4.6 2018 · score 4.7 2019 · score 5.5 2020 · score 7.8 2021 · score 7.6 2022 · score 7.2 2023 · score 6.9 2024 · score 6.9 2025 · score 6.8 2026 · score 6.8

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.7 Regional 4.7 State 6.8 Economic 2.8 Supply 6.8 Rent Control 9.2 Eviction 6.9 Tenant 6.7 Housing 6.9 6.8 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +16.9% (2024)
    4.7
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.7
  3. State political climate
    California legislature & governorship
    6.8
  4. Economic stress
    8.4% poverty · 8.6% unemp.
    2.8
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,234 average · 11.1% renters
    6.8
  6. Rent Control risk
    40.9% of income on rent
    9.2
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    248 days filing → judgment
    6.9
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    11.1% renters
    6.7
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    6.9
Geographic context

Risk heat across Clear Creek and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Clear Creek compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Plumas County
Low
#26 of 34 cities
Rank in county, 24th percentileLowHigh
#26 of 34 cities in Plumas County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in California
Very Low
#1544 of 1,594 cities
Rank in state, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#1544 of 1,594 cities in California for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Clear Creek risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Clear Creek: 6.86.8Clear CreekThis cityCounty: 7.37.3Countyavg in countyState: 8.48.4Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.8
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.8/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+4.3 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 248d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,234/mo. A contested eviction takes 248 days and costs $16,662–$33,001 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 11.1%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 172 residents, 11.1% rent. 41% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 8.4% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4.7
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4.7 and 4.7 (GOP margin +16.9% (2024)). State climate at 6.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.8
    State politics
    The process

    Long calendar, heavy friction.

    State political climate 6.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.9, housing court bias 6.9, rent-control risk 9.2. The slow part is the calendar, not the motion practice.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.9 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 2.8
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 2.8. Supply constraint: 6.8. The numbers behind those: 8.4% poverty, 8.6% unemployment, 41% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Clear Creek sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Los Angeles, CA · 273d · ~$22.4k all-in ($82/day) · score 9.9 Los Angeles San Diego, CA · 277d · ~$25.9k all-in ($94/day) · score 8.7 San Diego San Jose, CA · 261d · ~$24.2k all-in ($93/day) · score 9.2 San Jose San Francisco, CA · 273d · ~$23.9k all-in ($88/day) · score 9.7 San Francisco Fresno, CA · 279d · ~$24.4k all-in ($88/day) · score 8.9 Fresno Sacramento, CA · 281d · ~$25.0k all-in ($89/day) · score 9.2 Sacramento Long Beach, CA · 291d · ~$26.4k all-in ($91/day) · score 9.6 Long Beach Oakland, CA · 282d · ~$24.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 9.9 Oakland Bakersfield, CA · 249d · ~$25.6k all-in ($103/day) · score 7.7 Bakersfield Anaheim, CA · 258d · ~$23.3k all-in ($90/day) · score 8 Anaheim Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Clear Creek
Clear Creek · 248d · ~$24.8k all-in ($100/day) · score 6.8 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Clear Creek, CA

Landlording in Clear Creek, California, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.8/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Clear Creek is a city of 172 residents where 11.1% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 40.9% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,234/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Clear Creek eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.9/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Clear Creek closes 248 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Clear Creek's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 6.9/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Clear Creek runs $16,662 to $33,001 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 248 days of typical timeline and $1,234/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 6.7/10 in Clear Creek, and the city sits at the top of the rent control risk spectrum (9.2/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In California, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Clear Creek: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match California's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $33,001 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Clear Creek

Trap · AB 1482
The 5.2/10 score weighs nine sub-factors. The most relevant for landlords are court bias, eviction process difficulty, and supply constraint. See the sub-score breakdown above. State-level framework: AB 1482 + Costa-Hawkins.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my Clear Creek tenant just stops paying rent?

If your tenant stops paying, immediately serve a 3-day pay-or-quit notice. If they don't comply, you must file an unlawful detainer lawsuit. Do not change locks, turn off utilities, or remove their belongings; these are illegal "self-help" evictions and will get you into serious trouble.
Q2

Can I evict a tenant in Clear Creek for a lease violation that isn't about rent?

Yes, but it depends on the violation and whether it's curable. For minor, curable violations (e.g., unauthorized pet), you'd typically serve a 3-day notice to cure or quit. For serious, non-curable violations (e.g., illegal activity), you can serve a 3-day unconditional quit notice. Remember California's just-cause requirements still apply.
Q3

How long does it really take to evict someone in Clear Creek?

Our data shows a typical eviction timeline of 248 days in California. This is an average and can vary based on court backlog, tenant response, and whether they fight the eviction. It's a long process, so plan accordingly.
Q4

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Clear Creek?

While you can represent yourself, it's highly recommended to hire an attorney for an eviction in California. The process is complex, and even minor errors can lead to significant delays and costs. Given the high housing-court-bias and process difficulty, a good lawyer is a sound investment.
Q5

What are the rules for late fees in Clear Creek?

Late fees must be reasonable and not punitive. In California, they typically cannot exceed a small percentage of the monthly rent (e.g., 5-10%). They must be clearly stated in your lease agreement. You can only charge a late fee if the rent is truly late according to your lease and state law.
Q6

Can I increase the rent on my Clear Creek property?

Yes, but California has statewide rent control (AB 1482). This limits annual rent increases to 5% plus the percentage change in the cost of living index (CPI), or 10%, whichever is lower. You must also provide proper notice for any rent increase, typically 30 or 60 days depending on the amount of the increase. For more details, consult the California eviction risk overview.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.8/10 places Clear Creek in the 3rd percentile of California cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.