Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Census Tract · Ranked #9,878 of 84,120 nationally
Banning Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06065044103 · Riverside, CA · pop 6,256 · 96% of tract blocks fall in Banning
Banning anchors census tract 06065044103, which lands at 6.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #11,988 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 68% of renter households, a severe level, and 37% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,915 a month against an average household income of $62,112 a year, roughly 37% of income at the averages. About 18% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
6.2
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12%
Stable renters 6%
Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units2,679
Renter share17.9%
SVI overall0.77
Poverty rate8.8%
Median income$62,112
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
77
th percentile
High
Within state
63
th percentile
Elevated
National
88
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Banning and the region
Centroid at 33.9369, -116.9288 · click any tract to drill in
Why Banning scores 6.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Banning
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
8.8% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,915 rent vs county FMR
3.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Banning
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Banning
6.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Banning
8.1
How Banning compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 77
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 44%Socioeconomic
- 96%Household composition
- 72%Racial/ethnic minority
- 80%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 14.5%Housing insecurity
- 7.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 17.7%Food insecurity
- 15.0%SNAP enrollment
- 9.0%Transit barriers
- 11.0%No health insurance
- 16.0%Frequent mental distress
- 38.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Banning
The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Banning, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Riverside County average of 6.2 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 77th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
In CDC survey modeling, about 14.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 06065044103
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065044103?
Census tract 06065044103 in Banning scores 6.2/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06065044103?
Median gross rent is $1,915/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 68% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06065044103?
8.8% of residents in tract 06065044103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,256.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06065044103?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 77th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 44th, household 96th, minority 72th, housing 80th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06065044103 struggle to pay rent?
About 14.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06065044103 compare to Banning overall?
Tract 06065044103 scores 6.2/10, lower than the parent city of Banning at 8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Banning; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Banning
Top eight tracts in Banning ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related