Within parent city
33
th percentile
Low
Census Tract · Ranked #6,289 of 84,120 nationally
Banning Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06065044101 · Riverside, CA · pop 2,682
Banning is where census tract 06065044101 sits, home to 2,682 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 6.5/10. That is riskier than roughly 88% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 51% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 28% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,130 monthly, set against $65,625 in average yearly household income, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 54% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
6.7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 27%
Stable renters 27%
Owners 46%
Tract context
Occupied units951
Renter share54.0%
SVI overall0.96
Poverty rate17.5%
Median income$65,625
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
86
th percentile
High
Within state
72
th percentile
Elevated
National
93
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Banning and the region
Centroid at 33.9267, -116.8943 · click any tract to drill in
Why Banning scores 6.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Banning
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
17.5% poverty · this tract
4.4
Supply constraint
$1,130 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Banning
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Banning
6.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Banning
8.1
How Banning compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 96
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 92%Socioeconomic
- 97%Household composition
- 83%Racial/ethnic minority
- 82%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 26.7%Housing insecurity
- 13.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 33.0%Food insecurity
- 30.1%SNAP enrollment
- 16.0%Transit barriers
- 18.5%No health insurance
- 20.8%Frequent mental distress
- 41.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Banning
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Banning, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Riverside County average of 6.2 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 26.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 13.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 96th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 06065044101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065044101?
Census tract 06065044101 in Banning scores 6.7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06065044101?
Median gross rent is $1,130/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06065044101?
17.5% of residents in tract 06065044101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,682.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06065044101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 96th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 97th, minority 83th, housing 82th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06065044101 struggle to pay rent?
About 26.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06065044101 compare to Banning overall?
Tract 06065044101 scores 6.7/10, lower than the parent city of Banning at 8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Banning; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Banning
Top eight tracts in Banning ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related