Within parent city
83
th percentile
High
Census Tract · Ranked #3,733 of 84,120 nationally
Banning Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06065044300 · Riverside, CA · pop 4,799 · 96% of tract blocks fall in Banning
Tract 06065044300, home to 4,799 residents in Banning in Riverside County, scores 6.7/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 91% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 61% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,643 monthly, set against $58,278 in average yearly household income, roughly 34% of income at the averages. Renters make up 39% of occupied homes.
Risk score
7.3
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24%
Stable renters 15%
Owners 61%
Tract context
Occupied units1,384
Renter share38.8%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate22.5%
Median income$58,278
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
94
th percentile
Very High
Within state
81
th percentile
High
National
96
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Banning and the region
Centroid at 33.9197, -116.8724 · click any tract to drill in
Why Banning scores 7.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Banning
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
22.5% poverty · this tract
5.6
Supply constraint
$1,643 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Banning
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Banning
6.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Banning
8.1
How Banning compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 95
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 89%Socioeconomic
- 78%Household composition
- 83%Racial/ethnic minority
- 96%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 24.3%Housing insecurity
- 12.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 30.0%Food insecurity
- 27.0%SNAP enrollment
- 14.7%Transit barriers
- 17.6%No health insurance
- 19.6%Frequent mental distress
- 40.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Banning
The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Banning, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Riverside County average of 6.2 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 24.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 12.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 95th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 06065044300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065044300?
Census tract 06065044300 in Banning scores 7.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06065044300?
Median gross rent is $1,643/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06065044300?
22.5% of residents in tract 06065044300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,799.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06065044300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 89th, household 78th, minority 83th, housing 96th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06065044300 struggle to pay rent?
About 24.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06065044300 compare to Banning overall?
Tract 06065044300 scores 7.3/10, lower than the parent city of Banning at 8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Banning; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Banning
Top eight tracts in Banning ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related