Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #34,332 of 84,120 nationally

Jasmine Springs Eviction Risk: Moderate , Corona

Tract 06065041410 · Riverside, CA · pop 3,044 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Census tract 06065041410 runs through the Jasmine Springs neighborhood of Corona. With 3,044 residents, it scores $1/10 for landlords. It lands near the 76th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 58% of renter households, a severe level, and 16% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,477 a month while the average household earns $72,982 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. Renters make up 43% of occupied homes.

Risk score
4.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25% Stable renters 18% Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units632
Renter share43.0%
SVI overall0.83
Poverty rate14.5%
Median income$72,982

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Jasmine Springs
Very Low
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Corona
Very High
Within county
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#350 of 518 tracts In Riverside
Low
Within state
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#6,499 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Corona and the region

Centroid at 33.8801, -117.5306 · click any tract to drill in

Why Jasmine Springs scores 4.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Corona
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
14.5% poverty · this tract
3.6
Supply constraint
$1,477 rent vs county FMR
1.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Corona
5.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Corona
5.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Corona
4.6

How Jasmine Springs compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Jasmine Springs risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.44.4This tracttract 041410Corona: 7.77.7Coronaparent cityCounty: 5.15.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 83

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Jasmine Springs. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Jasmine Springs

The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 6.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Corona eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Riverside County average of 6.2 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 83rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 28.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 13.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06065041410

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065041410?

Census tract 06065041410 in the Jasmine Springs neighborhood scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06065041410?

Median gross rent is $1,477/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06065041410?

14.5% of residents in tract 06065041410 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,044.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06065041410?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 83th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 73th, minority 97th, housing 34th.
Q5

Is tract 06065041410 considered part of Jasmine Springs?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06065041410 fall within Jasmine Springs (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06065041410 struggle to pay rent?

About 28.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06065041410 compare to Corona overall?

Tract 06065041410 scores 4.4/10, lower than the parent city of Corona at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Corona eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Corona

Top eight tracts in Corona ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related