Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #31,159 of 84,120 nationally

De Anza Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Jurupa Valley

Tract 06065040405 · Riverside, CA · pop 5,673 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Here is how census tract 06065040405, in the De Anza Village neighborhood of Jurupa Valley, looks to a landlord: a 6.4/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 5,673. That is riskier than roughly 86% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 76% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 63% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,061 a month while the average household earns $114,755 a year, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 20% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 5% Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units1,706
Renter share19.9%
SVI overall0.87
Poverty rate10.9%
Median income$114,755

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In De Anza Village
Moderate
Within parent city
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#16 of 22 tracts In Jurupa Valley
Low
Within county
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#336 of 518 tracts In Riverside
Low
Within state
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#6,254 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Jurupa Valley and the region

Centroid at 33.9892, -117.4607 · click any tract to drill in

Why De Anza Village scores 4.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Jurupa Valley
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
10.9% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$2,061 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Jurupa Valley
8.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Jurupa Valley
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Jurupa Valley
6.9

How De Anza Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
De Anza Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.64.6This tracttract 040405Jurupa Valley: 7.87.8Jurupa Valleyparent cityCounty: 5.15.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 87

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within De Anza Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in De Anza Village

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Jurupa Valley, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Riverside County average of 6.2 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 87th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 17.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06065040405

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065040405?

Census tract 06065040405 in the De Anza Village neighborhood scores 4.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06065040405?

Median gross rent is $2,061/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 76% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06065040405?

10.9% of residents in tract 06065040405 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,673.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06065040405?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 87th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 71th, household 79th, minority 78th, housing 93th.
Q5

Is tract 06065040405 considered part of De Anza Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06065040405 fall within De Anza Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06065040405 struggle to pay rent?

About 17.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06065040405 compare to Jurupa Valley overall?

Tract 06065040405 scores 4.6/10, lower than the parent city of Jurupa Valley at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Jurupa Valley; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Jurupa Valley

Top eight tracts in Jurupa Valley ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related