Census Tract · Ranked #41,206 of 84,120 nationally
Mather Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 06067008802 ·
Sacramento, CA · pop 2,938 · 91% of tract blocks fall in Mather
Census tract 06067008802 covers part of Mather, CA, and scores 4.5/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,938. It sits 2.6 points below the Sacramento County average of 7.1.
Risk score
4.5
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0%Stable renters 6%Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units850
Renter share5.6%
SVI overall0.12
Poverty rate2.9%
Median income$160,435
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0th percentile
#2 of 2 tracts In Mather
Very Low
Within county
2th percentile
#357 of 363 tracts In Sacramento
Very Low
Within state
2th percentile
#8,914 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
National
51th percentile
#41,206 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Mather and the region
Centroid at 38.5405, -121.2632 · click any tract to drill in
Why Mather scores 4.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mather
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mather
6.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mather
4.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mather
4.7
How Mather compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 12
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
9.5%Housing insecurity
5.0%Utility-shutoff threat
9.1%Food insecurity
7.7%SNAP enrollment
6.0%Transit barriers
4.9%No health insurance
15.7%Frequent mental distress
22.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Mather
Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. Food insecurity runs 9.1% against 17.8% nationally.
Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 6.9/10. SNAP participation runs 7.7% against 15.2% nationally.
Nationally it ranks #41,206 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 6% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 3.0 points cooler. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06067008802
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067008802?
Census tract 06067008802 in Mather scores 4.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 06067008802?
2.9% of residents in tract 06067008802 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,938.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 06067008802?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 12th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 1th, household 45th, minority 65th, housing 21th.
Q4
What share of households in tract 06067008802 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q5
How does tract 06067008802 compare to Mather overall?
Tract 06067008802 scores 4.5/10, lower than the parent city of Mather at 5.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mather; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Mather
Top eight tracts in Mather ranked by composite eviction-risk score.