Skip to content
Map of Sacramento County, CA eviction risk by city, county average 6.9 out of 10
County brief·Updated June 1, 2026

Sacramento County, California Eviction Risk: High

35 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of Sacramento (8.8) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.

County Risk Score7.5/ 10 · High
Cities tracked35municipalities
Census tracts363scored
Population1.6MLiving in 35 cities
Income spent on rent33.0%avg renter household
Average rent$1,866/ month

Sacramento County averages 6.9/10 across 35 cities, ranging from a low of 4.9 to a high of 8 in the city of Sacramento, the county's highest-risk market. That places Sacramento County 4th highest in landlord eviction risk among California's 58 counties.

How Sacramento County ranks in California

Lower number means more extreme, where #1 is the most
Eviction Risk Score
Very High
#6 of 58 CA counties 7.6 / 10
Eviction Risk Score, 91st percentileBottomTop
#6 of 58 counties in California for landlord eviction risk.
Cost of living
Very High
#1 of 51 states (statewide) 110.7 index
Cost of living, 100th percentileBottomTop
California ranks #1 of 51 states on overall cost of living (10.7% more expensive than the U.S. avg).
Housing services cost
Very High
#2 of 51 states (statewide) 154.3 index
Housing services cost, 98th percentileBottomTop
California ranks #2 of 51 states on housing services (54.3% more expensive than the U.S. avg).
Income spent on rent
Moderate
#31 of 58 CA counties 33.5% of income
Income spent on rent, 47th percentileBottomTop
#31 of 58 counties in California on % of income spent on rent.
Cities in Sacramento County
Sorted by Eviction Risk Score · highest first
Map view
CityPopulationRisk% income on rentAverage rentLean
001 Sacramento Pop 528,706 · 32.8% income · $1,779 rent · Dem 528,706 7.6 32.8% $1,779 Dem
002 Elk Grove Pop 179,155 · 32.0% income · $2,262 rent · Dem 179,155 7.2 32.0% $2,262 Dem
003 Arden-Arcade Pop 94,994 · 35.9% income · $1,588 rent · Dem 94,994 8.0 35.9% $1,588 Dem
004 Citrus Heights Pop 86,995 · 32.8% income · $1,827 rent · Dem 86,995 7.5 32.8% $1,827 Dem
005 Folsom Pop 83,916 · 28.6% income · $2,352 rent · Dem 83,916 6.4 28.6% $2,352 Dem
006 Rancho Cordova Pop 81,849 · 31.6% income · $1,787 rent · Dem 81,849 7.9 31.6% $1,787 Dem
007 Carmichael Pop 76,948 · 35.6% income · $1,702 rent · Dem 76,948 8.0 35.6% $1,702 Dem
008 Florin Pop 50,211 · 30.6% income · $1,622 rent · Dem 50,211 8.3 30.6% $1,622 Dem
009 Antelope Pop 48,301 · 30.7% income · $2,189 rent · Dem 48,301 7.3 30.7% $2,189 Dem
010 North Highlands Pop 47,957 · 36.1% income · $1,636 rent · Dem 47,957 8.3 36.1% $1,636 Dem
011 Vineyard Pop 43,751 · 36.2% income · $2,090 rent · Dem 43,751 7.4 36.2% $2,090 Dem
012 Foothill Farms Pop 36,435 · 37.4% income · $1,695 rent · Dem 36,435 8.8 37.4% $1,695 Dem
013 Orangevale Pop 35,958 · 33.0% income · $1,932 rent · Dem 35,958 7.2 33.0% $1,932 Dem
014 Fair Oaks Pop 32,799 · 30.5% income · $1,910 rent · Dem 32,799 7.0 30.5% $1,910 Dem
015 Galt Pop 25,962 · 31.8% income · $1,596 rent · Dem 25,962 6.8 31.8% $1,596 Dem
016 Rosemont Pop 23,766 · 36.0% income · $1,831 rent · Dem 23,766 7.4 36.0% $1,831 Dem
017 Rio Linda Pop 16,335 · 33.2% income · $1,839 rent · Dem 16,335 7.8 33.2% $1,839 Dem
018 Parkway Pop 15,397 · 33.7% income · $1,517 rent · Dem 15,397 7.5 33.7% $1,517 Dem
019 Lemon Hill Pop 15,312 · 34.8% income · $1,421 rent · Dem 15,312 7.6 34.8% $1,421 Dem
020 La Riviera Pop 11,492 · 32.5% income · $1,849 rent · Dem 11,492 7.4 32.5% $1,849 Dem
021 Gold River Pop 7,924 · 37.5% income · $2,448 rent · Dem 7,924 7.1 37.5% $2,448 Dem
022 Wilton Pop 6,433 · 28.7% income · $1,823 rent · Dem 6,433 7.0 28.7% $1,823 Dem
023 Fruitridge Pocket Pop 6,095 · 38.6% income · $1,473 rent · Dem 6,095 7.5 38.6% $1,473 Dem
024 Rancho Murieta Pop 5,875 · 34.6% income · $2,579 rent · Dem 5,875 6.5 34.6% $2,579 Dem
025 Elverta Pop 4,769 · 39.7% income · $1,551 rent · Dem 4,769 7.2 39.7% $1,551 Dem
026 Mather Pop 4,520 · 29.5% income · $2,181 rent · Dem 4,520 7.2 29.5% $2,181 Dem
027 Herald Pop 1,521 · 33.1% income · $1,922 rent · Dem 1,521 7.0 33.1% $1,922 Dem
028 McClellan Park Pop 1,486 · 41.6% income · $1,888 rent · Dem 1,486 7.6 41.6% $1,888 Dem
029 Clay Pop 1,302 · 51.0% income · $1,469 rent · Dem 1,302 7.1 51.0% $1,469 Dem
030 Walnut Grove Pop 926 · 29.1% income · $1,471 rent · Dem 926 7.5 29.1% $1,471 Dem
031 Isleton Pop 522 · 29.5% income · $1,168 rent · Dem 522 7.4 29.5% $1,168 Dem
032 Courtland Pop 496 · 13.4% income · $1,239 rent · Dem 496 7.2 13.4% $1,239 Dem
033 Hood Pop 317 · 33.1% income · $1,922 rent · Dem 317 7.0 33.1% $1,922 Dem
034 Franklin Pop 245 · 33.1% income · $1,922 rent · Dem 245 7.0 33.1% $1,922 Dem
035 Freeport Pop 58 · 33.1% income · $1,922 rent · Dem 58 7.0 33.1% $1,922 Dem

County heatmap

Geographic distribution
Local landlord context

One county, multiple regulatory regimes.

Sacramento County carries an average eviction-risk score of 7.5/10, placing it in the High tier, and ranks 6th of 58 counties in California, meaning only 5 counties in the state are harder on landlords. Across the county's 35 cities, conditions are persistently challenging: rent-burdened renters make up a significant share of a 40.6% renter population, and the county's average rent of $1,866 leaves little financial cushion when income disruptions hit. For investors evaluating the Sacramento metro, California state law layers additional friction on top of already elevated local risk, and that combination shapes every leasing and recovery decision you will make here.

The intra-county spread, 6.4 at the low end to 8.8 at the high end, is wide enough to matter enormously. A landlord operating in Folsom faces a meaningfully different risk environment than one managing units in Foothill Farms, even though both addresses share the same county assessor, the same state courts, and the same California eviction process. Where you buy within Sacramento County can shift your effective risk tier by more than two full points, so underwriting at the county average understates exposure in most of the urban core.

Because the eviction process here can be slow, costly, and procedurally demanding, this is precisely why many investors find that working with a professional property manager is one of the most effective ways to reduce their exposure in this market.

The cities inside Sacramento County

At the top of the risk range, Foothill Farms scores 8.8/10, the highest in the county. Florin, with a population of 50,211, and North Highlands both score 8.3/10, putting them well above the county average. Arden-Arcade (8/10, pop. 94,994) and Carmichael (8/10, pop. 76,948) round out the top tier of elevated-risk communities. Even the city of Sacramento itself, at 7.6/10 with a population of 528,706, sits above the county average and above most jurisdictions in the state.

The lower end of the county offers comparatively better conditions. Folsom scores 6.4/10, the lowest in the county, with a population of 83,916, and Elk Grove comes in at 7.2/10 with 179,155 residents. These markets still sit in a state with demanding landlord-tenant laws, but the local risk factors, including poverty rates, eviction filings, and tenant protections, are less severe than in the urban core. Risk inside Sacramento County is genuinely hyper-local, and a portfolio spread across multiple submarkets can carry very different aggregate exposure than any single-market average suggests.

State-level laws that apply here

Every property in Sacramento County operates under California law regardless of any local ordinance. For non-payment of rent, a curable lease violation, or an incurable nuisance, California requires only a 3-day notice to the tenant before filing. No-cause terminations require 30 days for tenancies under one year and 60 days for tenancies of one year or more. Under AB 1482, properties that are not exempt from just-cause eviction protections require a qualifying reason to terminate, and statewide rent increases are capped at 5% plus CPI, maximum 10%, per Cal. Civ. Code § 1947.12. Landlords should also note that the Costa-Hawkins Act limits but does not preempt local rent control on pre-1995 multi-unit buildings, meaning certain Sacramento-area cities may impose stricter caps. For a full breakdown, see the California eviction process guide and the California eviction costs guide.

Once a case is filed, court filing fees run $240 to $435, sheriff lockout fees add $75 to $145, and attorney fees for a contested matter typically run $1,500 to $4,500. Uncontested cases resolve in 35 to 60 days; contested cases can stretch to 75 to 180 days. California also mandates 24-hour advance notice for landlord entry under Civ. Code § 1941. Screening carries its own compliance layer: source-of-income discrimination is banned under SB 329, criminal-history blanket bans are prohibited under FEHA, and application fees are capped at roughly $62.22, adjusted annually under CC § 1950.6.

With a poverty rate of 12.6% and 40.6% of residents renting, Sacramento County has the renter concentration and economic stress that drive eviction-risk scores upward, and the city grid above breaks that risk down to the neighborhood level across all 35 cities in the county.

How Sacramento County compares

Within California, Sacramento County's 6.9/10 eviction-risk score ranks 4th highest among the state's 58 counties, putting it firmly in the upper tier for landlord risk. It sits just below Santa Clara County at 7, and above coastal and Central Valley peers including San Diego County at 6.6, Fresno County at 6.6, Alameda County at 6.5, and San Joaquin County at 6.3.

For investors, that ranking means Sacramento County is meaningfully riskier than most of the state, and the same California eviction laws statutes, including AB 1482 just-cause and the 5%+CPI rent cap, govern every one of its 35 cities.

Peer counties in California

Same state, closest by population and Eviction Risk Score
Peer county
Santa Clara County eviction risk
7.6
/ 10 · High
Pop. 1.8M
Peer county
San Bernardino County eviction risk
7.7
/ 10 · High
Pop. 2.1M
Peer county
Alameda County eviction risk
7.9
/ 10 · High
Pop. 1.6M
Peer county
Contra Costa County eviction risk
7.1
/ 10 · Elevated
Pop. 1.2M

Where eviction risk concentrates in Sacramento County

Top cities + top neighborhoods · click any card for the full breakdown

Top cities by population

Top neighborhoods by risk

Frequently asked

Frequently asked questions about Sacramento County

Q1

How does Sacramento County compare to California statewide?

Sacramento County averages 7.5/10. Use the California overview link in the breadcrumb above for statewide comparison.

Q2

Is 33.0% rent-to-income ratio high for Sacramento County?

33.0% is above the 30% federal threshold.

Q3

Where can I see all cities in Sacramento County?

The city grid above lists every municipality in Sacramento County with its risk score and population.