Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #5,413 of 84,120 nationally

North Highlands Eviction Risk: High

Tract 06067007434 · Sacramento, CA · pop 5,949

06067007434 is a census tract in North Highlands, CA. It scores 8.5/10 for landlords. Population here is 5,949. 31% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
8.5
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 13% Owners 77%
Tract context
Occupied units1,600
Renter share22.5%
SVI overall0.73
Poverty rate22.1%
Median income$80,813

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 8 tracts In North Highlands
Elevated
Within county
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#84 of 363 tracts In Sacramento
High
Within state
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#2,547 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
National
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#5,413 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across North Highlands and the region

Centroid at 38.6995, -121.3730 · click any tract to drill in

Why North Highlands scores 8.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from North Highlands
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
22.1% poverty · this tract
5.5
Supply constraint
$1,737 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from North Highlands
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from North Highlands
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from North Highlands
8.2

How North Highlands compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
North Highlands risk score vs. parent city / county / state8.5This tracttract 0074347.2North Highlandsparent city7.1Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 73

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in North Highlands

What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.1/10. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10.

Sitting well above the midpoint, housing-court posture reads 8.2/10. Against the Sacramento County average of 7.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.4 points. SNAP participation runs 26.6% against 15.2% nationally.

The poverty rate is 22%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Against Sacramento County at 50.2%, 44% of renters here are cost-burdened. That is riskier than roughly 94% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

At 23% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 7.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.0 points hotter.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06067007434

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06067007434?

Census tract 06067007434 in North Highlands scores 8.5/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06067007434?

Median gross rent is $1,737/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06067007434?

22.1% of residents in tract 06067007434 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,949.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06067007434?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 73th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 61th, household 45th, minority 70th, housing 86th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06067007434 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06067007434 compare to North Highlands overall?

Tract 06067007434 scores 8.5/10, higher than the parent city of North Highlands at 7.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from North Highlands; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in North Highlands

Top eight tracts in North Highlands ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related