Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,119 of 84,120 nationally
Diamond Heights Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco
Tract 06075021200 · San Francisco, CA · pop 2,984 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
With a score of 9/10, tract 06075021200 in the Diamond Heights area of San Francisco, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,984. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Risk score
9
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14%
Stable renters 27%
Owners 59%
Tract context
Occupied units1,424
Renter share41.4%
SVI overall0.16
Poverty rate5.4%
Median income$195,714
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
21
th percentile
Low
Within county
23
th percentile
Low
Within state
80
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across San Francisco and the region
Centroid at 37.7532, -122.4381 · click any tract to drill in
Why Diamond Heights scores 9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from San Francisco
9.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.4% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$3,163 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
10.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Francisco
9.5
How Diamond Heights compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 16
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 12%Socioeconomic
- 8%Household composition
- 55%Racial/ethnic minority
- 43%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 100%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Diamond Heights. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.1%Housing insecurity
- 3.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.0%Food insecurity
- 4.9%SNAP enrollment
- 4.3%Transit barriers
- 3.3%No health insurance
- 13.3%Frequent mental distress
- 19.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Diamond Heights
Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. At $3,163 a month, rents run 28% over what the rest of San Francisco commands.
Disability prevalence runs 19.5% against 31.5% nationally. Food insecurity runs 6.0% against 17.8% nationally.
The severe-burden share is 14%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
That is riskier than roughly 95% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.4/10.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.5 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. 34% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.
It tracks the San Francisco County average of 9.5 closely. Annual rent works out to 19% of average household income of $195,714.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06075021200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075021200?
Census tract 06075021200 in the Diamond Heights neighborhood scores 9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06075021200?
Median gross rent is $3,163/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06075021200?
5.4% of residents in tract 06075021200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,984.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06075021200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 16th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 8th, minority 55th, housing 43th.
Q5
Is tract 06075021200 considered part of Diamond Heights?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06075021200 fall within Diamond Heights (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06075021200 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06075021200 compare to San Francisco overall?
Tract 06075021200 scores 9/10, lower than the parent city of San Francisco at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Francisco eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 06075021200 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco
Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
Japantown
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Potrero Terrace
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Telegraph Hill
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Hayes Valley
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Lower Nob Hill
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Transbay
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Outer Mission
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · CA
Parkmerced
9.9
/ 10 · Very High
Related