Duboce Triangle Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco
Tract 06075020202 · San Francisco, CA · pop 4,113 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Tract 06075020202 sits in the Duboce Triangle area of San Francisco eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.8/10. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across San Francisco and the region
Centroid at 37.7688, -122.4242 · click any tract to drill in
Why Duboce Triangle scores 9.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Duboce Triangle compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 46
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 22%Socioeconomic
- 12%Household composition
- 66%Racial/ethnic minority
- 93%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 62%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Duboce Triangle. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.1%Housing insecurity
- 5.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.1%Food insecurity
- 8.1%SNAP enrollment
- 6.3%Transit barriers
- 5.6%No health insurance
- 14.4%Frequent mental distress
- 21.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Duboce Triangle
On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. This is renter territory: 78% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.
Severe burden reaches 15%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Food insecurity runs 10.1% against 17.8% nationally. Against San Francisco County at 37.3%, around a third of renters here are cost-burdened.
SNAP participation runs 8.1% against 15.2% nationally. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
That is riskier than roughly 97% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Against average income of $166,932, annual rent is just 17%. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.3 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06075020202
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075020202?
What is the average rent in tract 06075020202?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06075020202?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06075020202?
Is tract 06075020202 considered part of Duboce Triangle?
What share of households in tract 06075020202 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06075020202 compare to San Francisco overall?
Was tract 06075020202 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco
Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.