Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,888 of 84,120 nationally

Lower Haight Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco

Tract 06075016700 · San Francisco, CA · pop 5,277 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

06075016700 is a census tract in the Lower Haight area of San Francisco, CA. It scores 8.7/10 for landlords. Population here is 5,277. 12% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well under the San Francisco County average of 37.3%.

Risk score
8.7
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 60% Owners 32%
Tract context
Occupied units2,315
Renter share68.6%
SVI overall0.11
Poverty rate2.9%
Median income$246,989

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Lower Haight
Very Low
Within parent city
2 th percentile
Rank, 2nd percentileLowHigh
#237 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Very Low
Within county
4 th percentile
Rank, 4th percentileLowHigh
#233 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Very Low
Within state
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#2,258 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Francisco and the region

Centroid at 37.7703, -122.4377 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lower Haight scores 8.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Francisco
9.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,908 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
10.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Francisco
9.5

How Lower Haight compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lower Haight risk score vs. parent city / county / state8.7This tracttract 0167009.9San Franciscoparent city9.5Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 11

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lower Haight. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lower Haight

What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10.

69% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. SNAP participation runs 5.5% against 15.2% nationally. At $2,908 a month, rents run 17% over what the rest of San Francisco commands.

It sits 0.8 points below the San Francisco County average of 9.5. Adults with no health insurance runs 4.0% against 11.3% nationally.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 94th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Against average income of $246,989, annual rent is just 14%. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.2 points hotter.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06075016700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075016700?

Census tract 06075016700 in the Lower Haight neighborhood scores 8.7/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06075016700?

Median gross rent is $2,908/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 12% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06075016700?

2.9% of residents in tract 06075016700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,277.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06075016700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 11th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 2th, minority 44th, housing 79th.
Q5

Is tract 06075016700 considered part of Lower Haight?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06075016700 fall within Lower Haight (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06075016700 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06075016700 compare to San Francisco overall?

Tract 06075016700 scores 8.7/10, lower than the parent city of San Francisco at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Francisco eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06075016700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 33% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco

Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related