Census Tract · Ranked #7,456 of 84,120 nationally

Country Club Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 06077001101 · San Joaquin, CA · pop 5,153 · 61% of tract blocks fall in Country Club

Here is how census tract 06077001101, in Country Club, looks to a landlord: a 6.8/10 eviction-risk score (Elevated tier) across a population of 5,153. That is riskier than about 92% of US census tracts.

52% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 20% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,946 a month while the average household earns $80,577 a year, roughly 29% of income at the averages. Renters make up 37% of occupied homes.

Risk score

6.5

Elevated

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 19% Stable renters 18% Owners 63%

Tract context

Occupied units1,686

Renter share37.2%

SVI overall0.63

Poverty rate20.9%

Median income$80,577

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Country Club and the region

Centroid at 37.9762, -121.3289 · click any tract to drill in

Why Country Club scores 6.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Country Club

6.1

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

5.7

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

20.9% poverty · this tract

5.2

Supply constraint

$1,946 rent vs county FMR

6.2

Rent control risk

Inherited from Country Club

8.2

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

6.8

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Country Club

6.3

Housing court bias

Inherited from Country Club

7.4

How Country Club compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 63

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

54%Socioeconomic
81%Household composition
78%Racial/ethnic minority
40%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
21%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

18.4%Housing insecurity
9.5%Utility-shutoff threat
22.1%Food insecurity
19.6%SNAP enrollment
11.6%Transit barriers
14.0%No health insurance
18.3%Frequent mental distress
35.2%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Country Club

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 8.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Country Club, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the San Joaquin County average of 6.2 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 18.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of B ("Still Desirable"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06077001101

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06077001101?

Census tract 06077001101 in Country Club scores 6.5/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06077001101?

Median gross rent is $1,946/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06077001101?

20.9% of residents in tract 06077001101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,153.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06077001101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 63th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 54th, household 81th, minority 78th, housing 40th.

What share of households in tract 06077001101 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06077001101 compare to Country Club overall?

Tract 06077001101 scores 6.5/10, lower than the parent city of Country Club at 8.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Country Club; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06077001101 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Country Club

Top eight tracts in Country Club ranked by composite eviction-risk score.