Skip to content
Burbank, California eviction risk overview
Ranked #546 of 1,865 nationally

Burbank, CA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Los Angeles County · Population 104,546

In 2026
Risk score
6.1
ELEVATED

53th percentile, California.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.7 Average4.1 Now6.1
10 5 1976 · score 1.7 1977 · score 1.8 1978 · score 1.9 1979 · score 2.0 1980 · score 1.9 1981 · score 2.0 1982 · score 2.0 1983 · score 2.0 1984 · score 2.0 1985 · score 1.9 1986 · score 2.0 1987 · score 2.0 1988 · score 2.3 1989 · score 2.4 1990 · score 2.5 1991 · score 2.5 1992 · score 3.2 1993 · score 3.2 1994 · score 3.2 1995 · score 3.2 1996 · score 3.3 1997 · score 3.3 1998 · score 3.4 1999 · score 3.5 2000 · score 3.5 2001 · score 3.6 2002 · score 3.7 2003 · score 3.7 2004 · score 3.9 2005 · score 4.0 2006 · score 4.1 2007 · score 4.2 2008 · score 4.8 2009 · score 5.0 2010 · score 5.1 2011 · score 5.2 2012 · score 5.3 2013 · score 5.4 2014 · score 5.6 2015 · score 5.7 2016 · score 6.2 2017 · score 6.5 2018 · score 6.7 2019 · score 7.1 2020 · score 8.0 2021 · score 8.0 2022 · score 8.0 2023 · score 8.0 2024 · score 7.8 2025 · score 5.8 2026 · score 6.1

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 7.6 Regional 7.6 State 6.8 Economic 6.6 Supply 9.5 Rent Control 7.9 Eviction 6.9 Tenant 9.5 Housing 6.7 6.1 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +32.9% (2024)
    7.6
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    7.6
  3. State political climate
    California legislature & governorship
    6.8
  4. Economic stress
    10.7% poverty · 6.9% unemp.
    6.6
  5. Supply constraint
    $2,192 average · 56.7% renters
    9.5
  6. Rent Control risk
    34.3% of income on rent
    7.9
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    292 days filing → judgment
    6.9
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    56.7% renters
    9.5
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    6.7
Geographic context

Risk heat across Burbank and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Burbank compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Los Angeles County
Very Low
#121 of 144 cities
Rank in county, 16th percentileBottomTop
#121 of 144 cities in Los Angeles County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in California
Moderate
#761 of 1,594 cities
Rank in state, 52nd percentileBottomTop
#761 of 1,594 cities in California for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Burbank risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Burbank: 6.16.1BurbankThis cityCounty: 8.38.3Countyavg in countyState: 7.27.2Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.25.2U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.1
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.1/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+4.4 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 292d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $2,192/mo. A contested eviction takes 292 days and costs $16,438-$33,908 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 56.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 104,546 residents, 56.7% rent. 34% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 10.7% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 7.6
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 7.6 and 7.6 (Dem margin +32.9% (2024)). State climate at 6.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.8
    State politics
    The process

    Long calendar, heavy friction.

    State political climate 6.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.9, housing court bias 6.7, rent-control risk 7.9. The slow part is the calendar, not the motion practice.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.9 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.6
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.6. Supply constraint: 9.5. The numbers behind those: 10.7% poverty, 6.9% unemployment, 34% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Burbank sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) San Jose, CA · 261d · ~$24.2k all-in ($93/day) · score 9.6 San Jose San Francisco, CA · 273d · ~$23.9k all-in ($88/day) · score 9.9 San Francisco Oakland, CA · 282d · ~$24.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 9.9 Oakland Fremont, CA · 254d · ~$26.2k all-in ($103/day) · score 6.1 Fremont Salinas, CA · 267d · ~$24.7k all-in ($93/day) · score 6.5 Salinas Hayward, CA · 287d · ~$27.6k all-in ($96/day) · score 9.7 Hayward Sunnyvale, CA · 287d · ~$24.9k all-in ($87/day) · score 5.2 Sunnyvale Santa Clara, CA · 243d · ~$24.8k all-in ($102/day) · score 5.2 Santa Clara Concord, CA · 252d · ~$23.8k all-in ($94/day) · score 9.2 Concord Berkeley, CA · 267d · ~$27.9k all-in ($104/day) · score 9.8 Berkeley Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.9 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.6 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 5.5 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 6.8 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.3 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 6.2 Seattle Burbank
Burbank · 292d · ~$25.2k all-in ($86/day) · score 6.1 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0-4   4-7   7-10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Burbank, CA

Landlording in Burbank, California, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.1/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Burbank is a city of 104,546 residents where 56.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 34.3% of income on rent. At an average rent of $2,192/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Burbank eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.9/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Burbank closes 292 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Burbank's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 6.7/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Burbank runs $16,438 to $33,908 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1-2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 292 days of typical timeline and $2,192/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 9.5/10 in Burbank, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (7.9/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In California, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Burbank: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match California's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $33,908 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Burbank

Trap · AB 1482
Politically, Santa Clara County voted Democratic by 47.4 points in 2020, a baseline that correlates with tenant-protective legislative pressure. Combined with 34.3% rent-to-income ratio, expect baseline enforcement of AB 1482 + Costa-Hawkins.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant pays part of the rent after I give them a 3-day notice?

Accepting a partial payment after issuing a 3-day notice to pay or quit typically "waives" that notice, meaning you have to start the notice process all over again. Generally, it's best to only accept the full amount of rent due, or not accept any payment and proceed with the eviction. If you do accept a partial payment, make sure it's under a written agreement that clarifies the remaining balance and does not waive your right to pursue the eviction for the unpaid portion.

Q2

Can I just change the locks if my tenant stops paying rent?

Absolutely not. This is an illegal "self-help" eviction and can result in significant penalties, including fines and damages paid to the tenant. In California, you must go through the formal Unlawful Detainer court process to legally remove a tenant, even if they are not paying rent.

Q3

How often can I raise the rent in Burbank?

Burbank falls under California's statewide rent control law, AB 1482. This law limits annual rent increases to 5% plus the percentage change in the cost of living (CPI), or 10%, whichever is lower. There are also just-cause eviction requirements under this law. Some properties are exempt, such as single-family homes or condos not owned by a corporation or LLC, or properties built within the last 15 years. Always check your specific property's exemption status and the current CPI before implementing a rent increase.

Q4

Do I have to provide a reason to terminate a month-to-month tenancy in Burbank?

Yes, due to California's statewide just-cause eviction law (AB 1482), you generally need a "just cause" to terminate a tenancy, even a month-to-month one, after a tenant has resided in the property for 12 months (or 12 months for one tenant, or 24 months for two or more tenants). Just causes include non-payment of rent, lease violations, or owner move-in. You cannot simply give a 60-day notice without cause for most properties.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.1/10 places Burbank in the 53rd percentile of California cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.