Within neighborhood
67
th percentile
Elevated
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,529 of 84,120 nationally
Newhall Eviction Risk: High , San Jose
Tract 06085505600 · Santa Clara, CA · pop 4,594 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
With a score of 9.2/10, tract 06085505600 in the Newhall area of Santa Clara, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,594. 34% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
9.2
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 38%
Stable renters 33%
Owners 29%
Tract context
Occupied units1,380
Renter share70.7%
SVI overall0.55
Poverty rate19.1%
Median income$117,269
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
80
th percentile
High
Within state
83
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across San Jose and the region
Centroid at 37.3513, -121.9456 · click any tract to drill in
Why Newhall scores 9.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from San Jose
8.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
19.1% poverty · this tract
4.8
Supply constraint
$2,266 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Jose
4.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Jose
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Jose
4.2
How Newhall compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 55
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 44%Socioeconomic
- 7%Household composition
- 64%Racial/ethnic minority
- 94%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 10%Grade B
- 42%Grade C
- 27%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Newhall. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.0%Housing insecurity
- 5.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 13.8%Food insecurity
- 11.2%SNAP enrollment
- 8.8%Transit barriers
- 6.5%No health insurance
- 19.0%Frequent mental distress
- 26.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Newhall
The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.6/10. Running cool, court filing pressure reads 1.3/10.
71% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Cost burden runs 53% here against 43.5% across Santa Clara County. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.6/10.
At $2,266 a month, rents run 25% under what the rest of Santa Clara commands. It sits 1.2 points above the Santa Clara County average of 8.0.
The poverty rate is 19%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Jose. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 96% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.9/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.7 points hotter.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 06085505600
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06085505600?
Census tract 06085505600 in the Newhall neighborhood scores 9.2/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06085505600?
Median gross rent is $2,266/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06085505600?
19.1% of residents in tract 06085505600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,594.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06085505600?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 55th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 44th, household 7th, minority 64th, housing 94th.
Q5
Is tract 06085505600 considered part of Newhall?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06085505600 fall within Newhall (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06085505600 struggle to pay rent?
About 11.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06085505600 compare to San Jose overall?
Tract 06085505600 scores 9.2/10, right in line with the parent city of San Jose at 9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Jose eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 06085505600 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 27% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in San Jose
Top eight tracts in San Jose ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related