Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #5,413 of 84,120 nationally

Newhall Eviction Risk: High , San Jose

Tract 06085505700 · Santa Clara, CA · pop 5,853 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Tract 06085505700 sits in the Newhall area of Santa Clara eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 8.5/10. Population here is 5,853. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.6/10.

Risk score
8.5
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 39% Stable renters 32% Owners 29%
Tract context
Occupied units2,463
Renter share70.6%
SVI overall0.36
Poverty rate12.5%
Median income$118,203

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Newhall
Very Low
Within parent city
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 25 tracts In San Jose
Very High
Within county
62 th percentile
Rank, 62nd percentileLowHigh
#154 of 408 tracts In Santa Clara
Elevated
Within state
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#2,547 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Jose and the region

Centroid at 37.3430, -121.9444 · click any tract to drill in

Why Newhall scores 8.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Jose
8.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
12.5% poverty · this tract
3.1
Supply constraint
$2,472 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Jose
4.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Jose
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Jose
4.2

How Newhall compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Newhall risk score vs. parent city / county / state8.5This tracttract 5057009.0San Joseparent city8.0Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 36

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Newhall. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Newhall

30% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Cost burden runs 55% here against 43.5% across Santa Clara County.

Running cool, court filing pressure reads 1.3/10. This is renter territory: 71% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 8.3/10. At $2,472 a month, rents run 18% under what the rest of Santa Clara commands. Food insecurity runs 10.5% against 17.8% nationally.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for San Jose. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 94% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.0 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. It tracks the Santa Clara County average of 8.0 closely.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06085505700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06085505700?

Census tract 06085505700 in the Newhall neighborhood scores 8.5/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06085505700?

Median gross rent is $2,472/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06085505700?

12.5% of residents in tract 06085505700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,853.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06085505700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 36th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 41th, household 2th, minority 72th, housing 79th.
Q5

Is tract 06085505700 considered part of Newhall?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06085505700 fall within Newhall (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06085505700 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06085505700 compare to San Jose overall?

Tract 06085505700 scores 8.5/10, lower than the parent city of San Jose at 9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Jose eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06085505700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Jose

Top eight tracts in San Jose ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related