Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

SoFA Eviction Risk: High , San Jose

Tract 06085501602 · Santa Clara, CA · pop 3,255 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

06085501602 is a census tract in the SoFA area of San Jose, CA. It scores 9.9/10 for landlords. It is home to 3,255 residents. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 9.5/10.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 47% Stable renters 43% Owners 10%
Tract context
Occupied units1,252
Renter share90.3%
SVI overall0.85
Poverty rate29.9%
Median income$54,417

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In SoFA
Very Low
Within parent city
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 216 tracts In San Jose
Very High
Within county
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#36 of 408 tracts In Santa Clara
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Jose and the region

Centroid at 37.3293, -121.8782 · click any tract to drill in

Why SoFA scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Jose
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
29.9% poverty · this tract
7.5
Supply constraint
$1,796 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Jose
9.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Jose
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Jose
8.5

How SoFA compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
SoFA risk score vs. parent city / county / state9.9This tracttract 5016029.0San Joseparent city8.0Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 85

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within SoFA. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in SoFA

This is renter territory: 90% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Set annual rent against average income of $54,417 and the ratio lands at 40%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.

Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9/10. At $1,796 a month, rents run 33% under what the rest of San Jose commands.

Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1/10. Against the Santa Clara County average of 8.0, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.9 points.

The severe-burden share is 21%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The poverty rate is 30%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

SNAP participation runs 29.5% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 31.7% against 17.8% nationally. Against Santa Clara County at 43.5%, 52% of renters here are cost-burdened.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.6/10.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06085501602

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06085501602?

Census tract 06085501602 in the SoFA neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06085501602?

Median gross rent is $1,796/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06085501602?

29.9% of residents in tract 06085501602 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,255.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06085501602?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 85th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 6th, minority 83th, housing 96th.
Q5

Is tract 06085501602 considered part of SoFA?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06085501602 fall within SoFA (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06085501602 struggle to pay rent?

About 24.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06085501602 compare to San Jose overall?

Tract 06085501602 scores 9.9/10, higher than the parent city of San Jose at 9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Jose eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06085501602 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 14% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Jose

Top eight tracts in San Jose ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related