Census Tract · Ranked #23,808 of 84,120 nationally
Patterson Tract Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 06107000902 ·
Tulare, CA · pop 3,824 · 17% of tract blocks fall in Patterson Tract
06107000902 is a census tract in Patterson Tract, CA. It scores 5.5/10 for landlords. Population here is 3,824. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 8.8/10.
Risk score
5.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%Stable renters 24%Owners 63%
Tract context
Occupied units808
Renter share37.5%
SVI overall0.57
Poverty rate10.8%
Median income$84,932
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Patterson Tract
Moderate
Within county
22th percentile
#81 of 103 tracts In Tulare
Low
Within state
14th percentile
#7,883 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
National
72th percentile
#23,808 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Patterson Tract and the region
Centroid at 36.4213, -119.3523 · click any tract to drill in
Why Patterson Tract scores 5.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Patterson Tract
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
10.8% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$996 rent vs county FMR
2.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Patterson Tract
8.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Patterson Tract
6.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Patterson Tract
8.0
How Patterson Tract compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 57
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
21.6%Housing insecurity
10.2%Utility-shutoff threat
26.6%Food insecurity
22.5%SNAP enrollment
13.4%Transit barriers
20.5%No health insurance
19.1%Frequent mental distress
36.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Patterson Tract
Cost burden runs roughly one in three here against 45.5% across Tulare County. Sitting well above the midpoint, housing-court posture reads 8/10. Against the Tulare County average of 6.9, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.4 points.
Running cool, supply constraint reads 2/10. Severe burden reaches 13%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Average gross rent is $996, 18% below the Patterson Tract average.
Adults with no health insurance runs 20.5% against 11.3% nationally. SNAP participation runs 22.5% against 15.2% nationally.
On the national scale it lands near the 72nd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.1/10.
Rent consumes only 14% of average household income of $84,932, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.0 points cooler.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 06107000902
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06107000902?
Census tract 06107000902 in Patterson Tract scores 5.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06107000902?
Median gross rent is $996/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06107000902?
10.8% of residents in tract 06107000902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,824.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06107000902?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 57th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 66th, household 19th, minority 82th, housing 53th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06107000902 struggle to pay rent?
About 21.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06107000902 compare to Patterson Tract overall?
Tract 06107000902 scores 5.5/10, lower than the parent city of Patterson Tract at 6.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Patterson Tract; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.