Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #9,878 of 84,120 nationally
Patterson Tract Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06107000902 · Tulare, CA · pop 3,824 · 17% of tract blocks fall in Patterson Tract
Tract 06107000902, home to 3,824 residents in Patterson Tract, scores 5.6/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 62% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
36% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 13% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $996 monthly, set against $84,932 in average yearly household income, roughly 14% of income at the averages. About 38% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
6.2
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%
Stable renters 24%
Owners 63%
Tract context
Occupied units808
Renter share37.5%
SVI overall0.57
Poverty rate10.8%
Median income$84,932
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
30
th percentile
Low
Within state
63
th percentile
Elevated
National
88
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Patterson Tract and the region
Centroid at 36.4213, -119.3523 · click any tract to drill in
Why Patterson Tract scores 6.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Patterson Tract
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
10.8% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$996 rent vs county FMR
2.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Patterson Tract
8.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Patterson Tract
6.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Patterson Tract
8.0
How Patterson Tract compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 57
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 66%Socioeconomic
- 19%Household composition
- 82%Racial/ethnic minority
- 53%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 21.6%Housing insecurity
- 10.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 26.6%Food insecurity
- 22.5%SNAP enrollment
- 13.4%Transit barriers
- 20.5%No health insurance
- 19.1%Frequent mental distress
- 36.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Patterson Tract
What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 8.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Patterson Tract, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Tulare County average of 6.0 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 21.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 10.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 57th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 06107000902
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06107000902?
Census tract 06107000902 in Patterson Tract scores 6.2/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06107000902?
Median gross rent is $996/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06107000902?
10.8% of residents in tract 06107000902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,824.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06107000902?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 57th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 66th, household 19th, minority 82th, housing 53th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06107000902 struggle to pay rent?
About 21.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06107000902 compare to Patterson Tract overall?
Tract 06107000902 scores 6.2/10, lower than the parent city of Patterson Tract at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Patterson Tract; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related