Skip to content
Map of Tulare County, CA eviction risk by city, county average 6.9 out of 10
County brief·Updated July 26, 2026

Tulare County, California Eviction Risk: High

60 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of Visalia (8.7) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.

In 2026
Risk score
8.2
HIGH

Ranked #13 of 58 CA counties

410k residents · 60 cities · 103 tracts

1976–2026 · pop-weighted from cities

Tulare County eviction risk score history

Min2.5 Average4.4 Now8.2
10 5 1976 · score 2.6 1977 · score 2.6 1978 · score 2.5 1979 · score 2.5 1980 · score 2.6 1981 · score 2.6 1982 · score 2.8 1983 · score 2.8 1984 · score 2.7 1985 · score 2.7 1986 · score 2.6 1987 · score 2.5 1988 · score 2.6 1989 · score 2.6 1990 · score 2.7 1991 · score 2.8 1992 · score 3.4 1993 · score 3.4 1994 · score 3.5 1995 · score 3.3 1996 · score 3.3 1997 · score 3.3 1998 · score 3.4 1999 · score 3.4 2000 · score 3.6 2001 · score 3.7 2002 · score 3.8 2003 · score 3.9 2004 · score 3.9 2005 · score 3.8 2006 · score 3.8 2007 · score 3.8 2008 · score 4.7 2009 · score 5.0 2010 · score 5.1 2011 · score 5.2 2012 · score 5.2 2013 · score 5.3 2014 · score 5.3 2015 · score 5.3 2016 · score 5.6 2017 · score 5.7 2018 · score 5.9 2019 · score 6.7 2020 · score 9.0 2021 · score 8.7 2022 · score 8.3 2023 · score 8.0 2024 · score 8.3 2025 · score 8.2 2026 · score 8.2

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Tulare County averages 8/10 across 60 cities spanning 7.1 to 8.7, with Visalia at the top of the range at 8.2/10. Tulare County ranks 12 of 58 California counties by eviction risk.

How Tulare County ranks in California

Lower number means more extreme, where #1 is the most
Eviction Risk Score
High
#13 of 58 CA counties 8.2 / 10
Eviction Risk Score, 79th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 58 counties in California for landlord eviction risk.
Cost of living
Very High
#1 of 51 states (statewide) 110.7 index
Cost of living, 100th percentileLowHigh
California ranks #1 of 51 states on overall cost of living (10.7% more expensive than the U.S. avg).
Housing services cost
Very High
#2 of 51 states (statewide) 154.3 index
Housing services cost, 98th percentileLowHigh
California ranks #2 of 51 states on housing services (54.3% more expensive than the U.S. avg).
Income spent on rent
Low
#43 of 58 CA counties 31.5% of income
Income spent on rent, 26th percentileLowHigh
#43 of 58 counties in California on % of income spent on rent.

Landlord guides for California

State-specific playbooks
California Eviction Costs →
Filing fees, attorney fees, lost rent, sheriff lockout
California Eviction Process →
Step-by-step timeline, notices, statute cites
California Rent Control →
Statewide caps, local ordinances, just-cause
California Tenant Screening →
Five-point protocol, legal rules, protected classes
California Tenant Protections →
Just cause, retaliation, habitability, entry
Cities in Tulare County
Sorted by Eviction Risk Score · highest first
Map view
CityPopulationRisk% income on rentAverage rentLean
001 Visalia Pop 143,939 · 30.1% income · $1,490 rent · Rep 143,939 8.2 30.1% $1,490 Rep
002 Tulare Pop 70,945 · 33.7% income · $1,435 rent · Rep 70,945 8.0 33.7% $1,435 Rep
003 Porterville Pop 63,157 · 33.7% income · $1,148 rent · Rep 63,157 8.2 33.7% $1,148 Rep
004 Dinuba Pop 25,475 · 40.3% income · $1,209 rent · Rep 25,475 8.5 40.3% $1,209 Rep
005 Lindsay Pop 12,643 · 29.5% income · $1,009 rent · Rep 12,643 8.2 29.5% $1,009 Rep
006 Farmersville Pop 10,397 · 35.6% income · $1,114 rent · Rep 10,397 8.3 35.6% $1,114 Rep
007 Exeter Pop 10,258 · 26.8% income · $1,286 rent · Rep 10,258 8.1 26.8% $1,286 Rep
008 Orosi Pop 8,966 · 31.2% income · $1,204 rent · Rep 8,966 8.7 31.2% $1,204 Rep
009 Woodlake Pop 7,702 · 35.7% income · $968 rent · Rep 7,702 8.2 35.7% $968 Rep
010 Earlimart Pop 7,214 · 29.8% income · $965 rent · Rep 7,214 8.2 29.8% $965 Rep
011 Goshen Pop 5,136 · 24.8% income · $1,231 rent · Rep 5,136 8.0 24.8% $1,231 Rep
012 East Porterville Pop 5,066 · 37.8% income · $1,044 rent · Rep 5,066 8.4 37.8% $1,044 Rep
013 Ivanhoe Pop 4,629 · 23.3% income · $870 rent · Rep 4,629 7.5 23.3% $870 Rep
014 Cutler Pop 4,361 · 29.6% income · $1,249 rent · Rep 4,361 8.5 29.6% $1,249 Rep
015 Pixley Pop 3,742 · 30.6% income · $1,475 rent · Rep 3,742 7.7 30.6% $1,475 Rep
016 Tipton Pop 2,851 · 30.7% income · $1,370 rent · Rep 2,851 8.2 30.7% $1,370 Rep
017 Strathmore Pop 2,675 · 51.0% income · $871 rent · Rep 2,675 8.2 51.0% $871 Rep
018 Three Rivers Pop 2,282 · 23.0% income · $1,557 rent · Rep 2,282 7.6 23.0% $1,557 Rep
019 Poplar-Cotton Center Pop 2,171 · 25.1% income · $1,044 rent · Rep 2,171 7.9 25.1% $1,044 Rep
020 Patterson Tract Pop 2,090 · 40.6% income · $1,220 rent · Rep 2,090 8.1 40.6% $1,220 Rep
021 Richgrove Pop 1,960 · 27.2% income · $961 rent · Rep 1,960 8.3 27.2% $961 Rep
022 Terra Bella Pop 1,659 · 9.0% income · $1,048 rent · Rep 1,659 8.0 9.0% $1,048 Rep
023 Woodville Pop 1,460 · 18.3% income · $1,102 rent · Rep 1,460 8.1 18.3% $1,102 Rep
024 Alpaugh Pop 859 · 38.0% income · $971 rent · Rep 859 8.2 38.0% $971 Rep
025 Linnell Camp Pop 821 · 26.0% income · $605 rent · Rep 821 7.6 26.0% $605 Rep
026 Sultana Pop 783 · 25.0% income · $850 rent · Rep 783 8.4 25.0% $850 Rep
027 Ducor Pop 704 · 44.4% income · $1,240 rent · Rep 704 7.8 44.4% $1,240 Rep
028 East Tulare Villa Pop 689 · 30.3% income · $1,455 rent · Rep 689 8.1 30.3% $1,455 Rep
029 Plainview Pop 545 · 45.0% income · $1,446 rent · Rep 545 8.4 45.0% $1,446 Rep
030 Springville Pop 514 · 13.4% income · $1,034 rent · Rep 514 8.0 13.4% $1,034 Rep
031 Lemon Cove Pop 484 · 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 484 8.0 32.2% $1,112 Rep
032 Woodville Farm Labor Camp Pop 468 · 16.3% income · $563 rent · Rep 468 7.8 16.3% $563 Rep
033 Tonyville Pop 433 · 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 433 8.0 32.2% $1,112 Rep
034 Traver Pop 382 · 51.0% income · $889 rent · Rep 382 8.3 51.0% $889 Rep
035 Seville Pop 377 · 14.5% income · $1,200 rent · Rep 377 8.1 14.5% $1,200 Rep
036 East Orosi Pop 324 · 72.0% income · $952 rent · Rep 324 8.7 72.0% $952 Rep
037 Pine Flat Pop 228 · 8.1% income · $875 rent · Rep 228 8.1 8.1% $875 Rep
038 Lindcove Pop 214 · 35.5% income · $1,602 rent · Rep 214 8.2 35.5% $1,602 Rep
039 Hypericum Pop 179 · 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 179 7.1 32.2% $1,112 Rep
040 Camp Nelson Pop 150 · 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 150 7.3 32.2% $1,112 Rep
041 El Rancho Pop 128 · 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 128 7.6 32.2% $1,112 Rep
042 Jovista Pop 107 · 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 107 7.3 32.2% $1,112 Rep
043 Kennedy Meadows Pop 93 · 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 93 8.0 32.2% $1,112 Rep
044 Hartland Pop 69 · 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 69 7.7 32.2% $1,112 Rep
045 Panorama Heights Pop 67 · 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 67 7.5 32.2% $1,112 Rep
046 Tooleville Pop 54 · 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 54 8.2 32.2% $1,112 Rep
047 Sequoia Crest Pop 54 · 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 54 7.5 32.2% $1,112 Rep
048 Rodriguez Camp Pop 45 · 31.3% income · $532 rent · Rep 45 8.4 31.3% $532 Rep
049 Idlewild Pop 42 · 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 42 7.2 32.2% $1,112 Rep
050 Ponderosa Pop 36 · 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 36 7.2 32.2% $1,112 Rep
051 Pierpoint Pop 34 · 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 34 8.0 32.2% $1,112 Rep
052 Wilsonia Pop 31 · 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 31 7.2 32.2% $1,112 Rep
053 Posey Pop 23 · 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 23 7.6 32.2% $1,112 Rep
054 California Hot Springs Pop 21 · 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 21 7.3 32.2% $1,112 Rep
055 Sugarloaf Saw Mill Pop 14 · 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 14 7.7 32.2% $1,112 Rep
056 Cedar Slope Pop 10 · 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 10 7.8 32.2% $1,112 Rep
057 Sugarloaf Village Pop 7 · 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 7 7.6 32.2% $1,112 Rep
058 Poso Park Pop 4 · 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 4 7.8 32.2% $1,112 Rep
059 McClenney Tract Pop 3 · 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 3 8.2 32.2% $1,112 Rep
060 Silver City 32.2% income · $1,112 rent · Rep 7.7 32.2% $1,112 Rep

County heatmap

Geographic distribution
Local landlord context

One county, multiple regulatory regimes.

Tulare County carries an average eviction-risk score of 8/10 (High), placing it 12th of 58 California eviction laws counties where rank 1 is the highest-risk, least landlord-friendly place. That means 11 counties in the state are riskier and 46 are more landlord-friendly, putting Tulare County firmly in the higher-risk third of California eviction laws. For landlords and investors, that headline figure reflects a market where a meaningful share of the county's roughly 409,774 residents rent at an average of $1,313/month, and where economic pressure runs high: a 17.8% poverty rate and an average rent-to-income burden of 32.1% leave many tenants financially stretched, which feeds into elevated eviction-filing frequency across the county.

Across the 60 cities and communities within Tulare County, scores range from a low of 8/10 to a high of 7.1/10. That spread matters: two landlords operating just a few miles apart can face meaningfully different collections risk and tenant-turnover dynamics. Understanding which specific city a property sits in is the most actionable first step, and it is exactly why hiring a good property manager who knows local conditions can move the needle.

The cities inside Tulare County

The highest-risk markets are Visalia (population 143,939, score 8.2/10) and Farmersville (population 10,397, score 8.3/10). Visalia is the county seat and by far the largest city, so its concentrated renter population dominates the county's overall profile. The city of Tulare (population 70,945, score 8/10) and Porterville (population 63,157, score 8.2/10) round out the larger urban centers and sit firmly in the elevated-to-high range as well. Several smaller communities, including Goshen, Cutler, and Linnell Camp, also post scores of 7.6/10, indicating that elevated risk is not confined to the county's bigger cities.

The most landlord-favorable scores belong to Dinuba at 8.5/10 (population 25,475) and Lindsay at 8.2/10 (population 12,643). Even these lower-risk communities are not particularly benign by national standards, but they do represent materially better operating conditions compared to the county's top-of-range cities. Risk in Tulare County is genuinely hyper-local, and no single county average captures what an owner experiences at the property level.

State-level laws that apply here

All Tulare County landlords operate under California statewide law, which is among the more demanding regulatory environments in the country. Non-payment of rent triggers a 3-day notice under CCP 1161(2), and curable or incurable lease violations also require a 3-day notice. No-cause terminations require 30 days for tenancies under one year and 60 days for tenancies of one year or more. AB 1482 imposes statewide just-cause eviction requirements and caps annual rent increases at 5% plus CPI, maximum 10%. Fully understanding the California eviction laws eviction process before placing a tenant is not optional, it is risk management. Court filing fees run $240 to $435, sheriff lockout fees add $75 to $145, and attorney fees for contested cases typically fall in the $1,500 to $4,500 range. An uncontested eviction resolves in as few as 35 days, but a contested case can stretch to 180 days. California eviction costs therefore vary enormously depending on whether a tenant decides to fight, and a realistic budget should account for the high end of the contested range.

With 42.6% of residents renting and a poverty rate of 17.8%, Tulare County's economic profile keeps delinquency risk elevated across most of its 60 cities; use the city grid above to compare individual market scores before committing to a specific submarket.

Historical eviction filings in Tulare County

From 2010 to 2017, eviction filings in Tulare County declined 31%. The peak was 2,316 filings in 2010.1

Annual filings 2010–2017 No filing data published after 2018
Annual eviction filings in Tulare County 2000-2018 (Eviction Lab)2010: 2,316 filings2011: 2,291 filings2012: 2,164 filings2013: 1,898 filings2014: 1,920 filings2015: 1,773 filings2016: 1,728 filings2017: 1,600 filings

Data covers 2000–2018, the full span of the Princeton Eviction Lab's national county court-records dataset.

How Tulare County compares

Within California, Tulare County's 8/10 eviction-risk score ranks 12 of 58 counties, placing it firmly in the Elevated tier. It tracks closely with its Central Valley peers: San Joaquin County at 6.91 and Kern County at 6.93 sit just above, while Stanislaus County at 6.81, Butte County at 6.8, and Solano County at 6.67 sit just below.

For landlords, this cluster means Tulare County offers no meaningful regulatory relief versus neighboring inland counties, since all share the same California eviction laws AB 1482 rent cap and just-cause framework. The differentiator is local rather than statutory, driven by the 60 cities ranging from 7.1 to 8.7.

Peer counties in California

Same state, closest by population and Eviction Risk Score
Peer county
Monterey County eviction risk
8.2
/ 10 · High
Pop. 360K
Peer county
Solano County eviction risk
8.1
/ 10 · High
Pop. 439K
Peer county
Santa Barbara County eviction risk
8
/ 10 · High
Pop. 429K
Peer county
Stanislaus County eviction risk
8.1
/ 10 · High
Pop. 502K

Where eviction risk concentrates in Tulare County

Top cities + top neighborhoods · click any card for the full breakdown

Top cities by population

Top neighborhoods by risk

Frequently asked

Frequently asked questions about Tulare County

Q1

How many renters live in Tulare County?

Renter share is 42.6%, so approximately 174,393 of Tulare County's 409,774 residents are renters.
Q2

What is the lowest-risk city in Tulare County?

The lowest score in Tulare County is 7.1/10. See the city grid above for the specific municipality.
Q3

What is the highest-risk city in Tulare County?

The highest score in Tulare County is 8.7/10. See the city grid above for the specific municipality.