Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #5,198 of 84,120 nationally

Nanceville Eviction Risk: Elevated , Porterville

Tract 06107003602 · Tulare, CA · pop 8,241 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

How risky is the Nanceville neighborhood of Porterville for landlords? Census tract 06107003602 scores 6.3/10, the Elevated tier. On the national scale it ranks #13,993 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 52% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 27% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,173 monthly, set against $69,419 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. Renters make up 42% of occupied homes.

Risk score
6.9
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22% Stable renters 20% Owners 58%
Tract context
Occupied units2,407
Renter share42.4%
SVI overall0.92
Poverty rate15.4%
Median income$69,419

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Nanceville
Very Low
Within parent city
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#12 of 15 tracts In Porterville
Low
Within county
49 th percentile
Rank, 49th percentileLowHigh
#53 of 103 tracts In Tulare
Moderate
Within state
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#2,277 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Porterville and the region

Centroid at 36.0668, -119.0481 · click any tract to drill in

Why Nanceville scores 6.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Porterville
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
15.4% poverty · this tract
3.8
Supply constraint
$1,173 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Porterville
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Porterville
8.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Porterville
7.8

How Nanceville compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Nanceville risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.96.9This tracttract 003602Porterville: 8.28.2Portervilleparent cityCounty: 6.86.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 92

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Nanceville. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Nanceville

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Porterville, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Tulare County average of 6.0 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 92nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 22.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 11.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06107003602

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06107003602?

Census tract 06107003602 in the Nanceville neighborhood scores 6.9/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06107003602?

Median gross rent is $1,173/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06107003602?

15.4% of residents in tract 06107003602 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 8,241.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06107003602?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 92th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 72th, household 90th, minority 81th, housing 97th.
Q5

Is tract 06107003602 considered part of Nanceville?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06107003602 fall within Nanceville (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06107003602 struggle to pay rent?

About 22.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06107003602 compare to Porterville overall?

Tract 06107003602 scores 6.9/10, lower than the parent city of Porterville at 8.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Porterville; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Porterville

Top eight tracts in Porterville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related