Neighborhood · Ranked #21,564 of 84,120 nationally
Mineral Palace Eviction Risk: Moderate , Pueblo
Tract 08101000600 ·
Pueblo County, CO · pop 1,866 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
Census tract 08101000600 covers part of the Mineral Palace area of Pueblo, CO, and scores 5.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 1,866. The main counterweight is supply constraint at 1.5/10.
Risk score
5.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24%Stable renters 35%Owners 41%
Tract context
Occupied units877
Renter share59.3%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate26.8%
Median income$45,772
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Mineral Palace
Moderate
Within parent city
75th percentile
#11 of 41 tracts In Pueblo
High
Within county
83th percentile
#11 of 58 tracts In Pueblo County
High
Within state
73th percentile
#390 of 1,447 tracts In Colorado
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Pueblo and the region
Centroid at 38.2798, -104.6184 · click any tract to drill in
Why Mineral Palace scores 5.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pueblo
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
Colorado legislature & governorship
4.7
Economic stress
26.8% poverty · this tract
6.7
Supply constraint
$813 rent vs county FMR
1.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pueblo
3.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pueblo
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pueblo
4.5
How Mineral Palace compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 86
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
84%Socioeconomic
75%Household composition
74%Racial/ethnic minority
77%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
10%Grade A
14%Grade B
65%Grade C
10%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Mineral Palace
The poverty rate is 27%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Average gross rent is $813, 25% below the Pueblo average. The severe-burden share is 17%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Cost burden runs 40% here against 48.2% across Pueblo County. Against the Pueblo County average of 4.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.3 points. Adults with no health insurance runs 21.7% against 11.3% nationally.
On the high side, court filing pressure reads 7.2/10. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Pueblo. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
On the national scale it lands near the 74th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.7/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.
Annual rent works out to 21% of average household income of $45,772. 59% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 08101000600
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 08101000600?
Census tract 08101000600 in the Mineral Palace neighborhood scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 08101000600?
Median gross rent is $813/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 08101000600?
26.8% of residents in tract 08101000600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,866.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 08101000600?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 84th, household 75th, minority 74th, housing 77th.
Q5
Is tract 08101000600 considered part of Mineral Palace?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 08101000600 fall within Mineral Palace (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How does tract 08101000600 compare to Pueblo overall?
Tract 08101000600 scores 5.7/10, higher than the parent city of Pueblo at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pueblo eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7
Was tract 08101000600 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 10% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Pueblo
Top eight tracts in Pueblo ranked by composite eviction-risk score.