Sedgwick County, Colorado Eviction Risk: Low
3 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of Julesburg (3.9) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.
Ranked #56 of 64 CO counties
2k residents · 3 cities · 1 tracts
Sedgwick County eviction risk score history
Key metrics
-
Tenant beats landlord37.8%/ 100 outcomesIn court-decided eviction outcomes for Sedgwick County, CO, tenants prevail in roughly 37.8% of contested cases. A higher number means landlords face stronger tenant defenses and longer calendars.
-
Timeline94dfiling → judgmentFrom the moment an unlawful-detainer notice is filed in Sedgwick County, CO until a money judgment is entered, a contested eviction takes about 94 days on average. Longer timelines mean more lost rent for landlords.
-
Cost range$4.7–12.1klegal + lost rentA typical eviction in Sedgwick County, CO costs landlords $4,650 to $12,063 all-in, covering court filing fees, process-server costs, attorney time, and lost rent.
-
Average rent$80131% stretched on rentAverage gross rent in Sedgwick County, CO is $801 per month per the U.S. Census American Community Survey. 31% of renter households here spend more than 30% of pre-tax income on rent.
-
Renters30.8%of households30.8% of occupied housing units in Sedgwick County, CO are renter-occupied. A higher renter share usually correlates with more eviction filings and a more active rental market.
-
Poverty16.7%2.6% unemp.16.7% of Sedgwick County, CO residents live below the federal poverty line, and unemployment runs at 2.6%. Both feed the economic-stress sub-score in our Eviction Risk Score model.
Scrub 50 years
Sedgwick County's 3.8/10 Low score reflects a small rural rental market with modest poverty rates and no local tenant-protection ordinances beyond Colorado's statewide just-cause and no-fault notice framework. 56th of 64 Colorado counties - in the lower-risk third of the state, with only 8 counties scoring lower.
How Sedgwick County ranks in Colorado
Landlord guides for Colorado
| City↕ | Population↕ | Risk↕ | % income on rent↕ | Average rent↕ | Lean↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Julesburg | 1,181 | 3.9 | 34.5% | $760 | Rep |
| 002 | Ovid | 468 | 3.9 | 30.0% | $906 | Rep |
| 003 | Sedgwick | 198 | 3.3 | 9.0% | $801 | Rep |
County heatmap
One county, multiple regulatory regimes.
Sedgwick County sits in the northeastern corner of Colorado, a sparsely populated agricultural county of roughly 1,847 residents where the rental market moves at a slower pace than the state's urban centers. The Eviction Risk Map rates the county at 3.8/10 (Low risk), placing it 56th out of 64 Colorado counties - meaning only 8 counties in the state are less risky for landlords. That ranking reflects a market where average rents run $801 per month, rent burden sits at 30.6% of renter income, and the renter share of households is about 30.8%. Poverty rates, at 16.7%, are modestly elevated relative to state norms, which is the primary factor pulling the score above the floor rather than any particularly aggressive local policy environment.
The county's three tracked cities - Julesburg, Ovid, and Sedgwick - all cluster in a tight 3.3-to-3.9 band. Julesburg (population 1,181) and Ovid (population 468) both score 3.9/10, while the town of Sedgwick (population 198) comes in at the lower end at 3.3/10. Julesburg serves as the county seat and economic hub; it accounts for the majority of the county's rental units and is therefore where most landlord-tenant disputes, if any arise, will be filed. The local justice system here is small - Sedgwick County has a single county court - so knowing the procedural calendar before initiating an eviction saves significant time.
Colorado's statewide landlord-tenant statute, C.R.S. § 38-12 (Tenants and Landlords), governs all residential tenancies in Sedgwick County. Just-cause eviction requirements apply under state law, which means landlords must have a qualifying reason to terminate a tenancy - nonpayment, material lease violation, substantial violation, or a legitimate business reason such as owner move-in or renovation. A nonpayment or material lease violation triggers a 10-day notice under C.R.S. 13-40-104(1)(d)-(e); a substantial violation shortens that to a 3-day notice under C.R.S. 13-40-107.5. No-fault terminations for owner move-in or renovation now require a 90-day notice under HB24-1098, a 2024 legislative change that significantly lengthened the runway landlords must provide. Court filing fees run $105 to $200, sheriff lockout fees add another $50 to $200, and uncontested cases typically resolve in 21 to 45 days from filing - contested matters can stretch to 60 to 120 days. Attorney costs, if retained, typically run $750 to $3,500 depending on case complexity. The Colorado Civil Rights Division enforces fair housing and source-of-income protections, which are covered under state law here.
Sedgwick County's low score reflects its small, stable rural rental market more than any formal tenant-protection infrastructure - but Colorado eviction laws's statewide just-cause and no-fault notice rules still apply in full and should be treated as binding regardless of local court volume.
Eviction filings in Sedgwick County
In June 2023, 1 eviction filings were recorded in Sedgwick County, 100.0% of the historical average (near average).1
- 1Jun 2023
- 100.0%of historical avg
- 277Renter households
- 14.5%Poverty rate
Historical eviction filings in Sedgwick County
From 2001 to 2017, eviction filings in Sedgwick County increased. The peak was 4 filings in 2002.2
- 02001
- 4Peak (2002)
- 12017
Data covers 2000–2018, the full span of the Princeton Eviction Lab's national county court-records dataset.
How Sedgwick County compares
At 3.8/10, Sedgwick County sits below the Colorado eviction laws state average and is closely bracketed by rural peers: Baca County (3.75), Washington County (3.66), Lincoln County (3.68), and Phillips County (3.68) all score in the same low band, while Park County (4.01) runs slightly higher - the main distinguishing factor across these counties is poverty rate and local court capacity rather than tenant-protection policy differences.