Census Tract · Ranked #22,213 of 84,120 nationally
Hollywood Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 12011090504 ·
Broward, FL · pop 3,296 · 40% of tract blocks fall in Hollywood
Here is how census tract 12011090504, in Hollywood eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 5.4/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 3,296. On the national scale it ranks #38,522 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
About 68% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 39% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,782 monthly, set against $46,623 in average yearly household income, roughly 46% of income at the averages. Renters make up 62% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 42%Stable renters 20%Owners 38%
Tract context
Occupied units1,144
Renter share62.2%
SVI overall0.96
Poverty rate24.7%
Median income$46,623
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
91th percentile
#4 of 36 tracts In Hollywood
Very High
Within county
92th percentile
#33 of 416 tracts In Broward
Very High
Within state
90th percentile
#523 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
High
National
74th percentile
#22,213 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Hollywood and the region
Centroid at 26.0396, -80.2072 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hollywood scores 5.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Hollywood
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.5
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
24.7% poverty · this tract
6.2
Supply constraint
$1,782 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hollywood
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hollywood
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hollywood
4.0
How Hollywood compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 96
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
83%Socioeconomic
82%Household composition
79%Racial/ethnic minority
99%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
249Total filings over 4 yrs
12.74%Avg annual filing rate
17.0%Peak (2002)
34Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2001 to 2016
Filings dropped 51% over the past 4 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
111Total filings 2020-21
2.0Avg monthly (observed)
3.2Pre-pandemic baseline
0.61×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2024-09-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Fort Lauderdale as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
The score leans hardest on economic stress at 6.2/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Hollywood eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Broward County average of 5.4 and above the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 249 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 12.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 17.0% of renter households in 2002.
The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 96th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 12011090504
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12011090504?
Census tract 12011090504 in Hollywood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 12011090504?
Median gross rent is $1,782/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 68% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 12011090504?
24.7% of residents in tract 12011090504 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,296.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 12011090504?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 96th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 82th, minority 79th, housing 99th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12011090504?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 249 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 12011090504 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 12.74% of renter households, peaking at 17.0% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
Did eviction filings in tract 12011090504 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.61× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Fort Lauderdale eviction risk), 2020-2021.
Q7
How does tract 12011090504 compare to Hollywood overall?
Tract 12011090504 scores 5.2/10, higher than the parent city of Hollywood at 2.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hollywood eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Hollywood
Top eight tracts in Hollywood ranked by composite eviction-risk score.