Neighborhood · Ranked #53,267 of 84,120 nationally
Lauderdale Lakes Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 12011050316 ·
Broward, FL · pop 1,980 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi
How risky is the Lauderdale Lakes neighborhood of Lauderdale Lakes for landlords? Census tract 12011050316 scores 5.4/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than roughly 54% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 41% of renter households, a severe level, and 13% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,141 monthly, set against $54,295 in average yearly household income, roughly 25% of income at the averages. About 9% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%Stable renters 5%Owners 91%
Tract context
Occupied units1,201
Renter share9.3%
SVI overall0.42
Poverty rate8.0%
Median income$54,295
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#9 of 9 tracts In Lauderdale Lakes
Very Low
Within parent city
43th percentile
#9 of 15 tracts In Lauderdale Lakes
Moderate
Within county
49th percentile
#211 of 416 tracts In Broward
Moderate
Within state
49th percentile
#2,623 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lauderdale Lakes and the region
Centroid at 26.1841, -80.2114 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lauderdale Lakes scores 3.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lauderdale Lakes
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.5
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
8.0% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$1,141 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lauderdale Lakes
9.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lauderdale Lakes
5.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lauderdale Lakes
7.7
How Lauderdale Lakes compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 42
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
54%Socioeconomic
66%Household composition
79%Racial/ethnic minority
9%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
7Total filings 2020-21
0.1Avg monthly (observed)
0.3Pre-pandemic baseline
0.46×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2024-09-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Fort Lauderdale as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Lauderdale Lakes. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 9.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lauderdale Lakes, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Broward County average of 5.4 and above the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is Black and White and ranks around the 42nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.46x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 12011050316
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12011050316?
Census tract 12011050316 in the Lauderdale Lakes neighborhood scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 12011050316?
Median gross rent is $1,141/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 12011050316?
8.0% of residents in tract 12011050316 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,980.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 12011050316?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 42th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 54th, household 66th, minority 79th, housing 9th.
Q5
Is tract 12011050316 considered part of Lauderdale Lakes?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12011050316 fall within Lauderdale Lakes (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
Did eviction filings in tract 12011050316 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.46× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Fort Lauderdale eviction risk), 2020-2021.
Q7
How does tract 12011050316 compare to Lauderdale Lakes overall?
Tract 12011050316 scores 3.3/10, higher than the parent city of Lauderdale Lakes at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lauderdale Lakes; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Lauderdale Lakes
Top eight tracts in Lauderdale Lakes ranked by composite eviction-risk score.