Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #48,083 of 84,120 nationally

Amanda Eviction Risk: Lower , Ruskin

Tract 12057014108 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 6,257 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

In Amanda in Ruskin, census tract 12057014108 scores 5.6/10 for eviction risk. It lands near the 62nd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

54% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,125 a month while the average household earns $69,861 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. Renters make up 30% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 14% Owners 70%
Tract context
Occupied units2,191
Renter share29.8%
SVI overall0.74
Poverty rate18.9%
Median income$69,861

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Amanda
Very High
Within parent city
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 6 tracts In Ruskin
High
Within county
52 th percentile
Rank, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#161 of 333 tracts In Hillsborough
Moderate
Within state
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#2,206 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Ruskin and the region

Centroid at 27.7145, -82.4352 · click any tract to drill in

Why Amanda scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Ruskin
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
18.9% poverty · this tract
4.7
Supply constraint
$1,125 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Ruskin
7.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Ruskin
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Ruskin
6.7

How Amanda compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Amanda risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.63.6This tracttract 014108Ruskin: 2.32.3Ruskinparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 74

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 262Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 4.39%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.6%Peak (2016)
  • 37Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 120570141082000: 34 filings (7.89/100 renter HHs)2001: 19 filings (4.41/100 renter HHs)2002: 15 filings (3.48/100 renter HHs)2003: 9 filings (2.09/100 renter HHs)2004: 19 filings (4.41/100 renter HHs)2005: 21 filings (4.02/100 renter HHs)2009: 26 filings (4.98/100 renter HHs)2010: 28 filings (4.75/100 renter HHs)2011: 22 filings (3.13/100 renter HHs)2015: 32 filings (4.56/100 renter HHs)2016: 37 filings (4.55/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 259Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.09×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2020-02-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2020-04-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2020-10-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2020-12-01: 7 filings (2.33× baseline)2021-01-01: 2 filings (0.44× baseline)2021-02-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2021-03-01: 5 filings (1.43× baseline)2021-04-01: 5 filings (1.82× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 3 filings (2.40× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (0.44× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 7 filings (5.60× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (0.44× baseline)2022-07-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-08-01: 5 filings (1.18× baseline)2022-09-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2022-10-01: 8 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 4 filings (0.84× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2023-01-01: 10 filings (2.22× baseline)2023-02-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2023-07-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (0.94× baseline)2023-09-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2023-12-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 5 filings (1.11× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-03-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2024-04-01: 5 filings (1.82× baseline)2024-05-01: 8 filings (6.40× baseline)2024-06-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2024-07-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-08-01: 9 filings (2.12× baseline)2024-09-01: 7 filings (5.60× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2024-11-01: 6 filings (1.26× baseline)2024-12-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2025-01-01: 14 filings (3.11× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-04-01: 6 filings (2.18× baseline)2025-05-01: 8 filings (6.40× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (0.44× baseline)2025-07-01: 6 filings (1.60× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2025-09-01: 4 filings (3.20× baseline)2025-10-01: 7 filings (1.75× baseline)2025-11-01: 10 filings (2.11× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Amanda. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Amanda

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 7.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Ruskin, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Hillsborough County average of 5.1 and above the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 74th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.09x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, roughly back to the pre-pandemic baseline.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 12057014108

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057014108?

Census tract 12057014108 in the Amanda neighborhood scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12057014108?

Median gross rent is $1,125/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12057014108?

18.9% of residents in tract 12057014108 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,257.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12057014108?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 74th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 84th, household 87th, minority 72th, housing 27th.
Q5

Is tract 12057014108 considered part of Amanda?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057014108 fall within Amanda (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12057014108?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 262 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 12057014108 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.39% of renter households, peaking at 4.6% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 12057014108 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.09× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 12057014108 compare to Ruskin overall?

Tract 12057014108 scores 3.6/10, higher than the parent city of Ruskin at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Ruskin; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Ruskin

Top eight tracts in Ruskin ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related