Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #66,742 of 84,120 nationally

Ruskin Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 12057014122 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 8,334

Tract 12057014122, home to 8,334 residents in Ruskin in Hillsborough County, scores 5.3/10 for landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #41,678 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

50% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,677 a month while the average household earns $78,625 a year, roughly 26% of income at the averages. About 26% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 13% Owners 74%
Tract context
Occupied units2,737
Renter share26.0%
SVI overall0.62
Poverty rate6.9%
Median income$78,625

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 6 tracts In Ruskin
Moderate
Within county
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#255 of 333 tracts In Hillsborough
Low
Within state
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#3,822 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Low
National
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#66,742 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Ruskin and the region

Centroid at 27.7242, -82.4067 · click any tract to drill in

Why Ruskin scores 2.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Ruskin
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
6.9% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,677 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Ruskin
7.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Ruskin
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Ruskin
6.7

How Ruskin compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Ruskin risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.52.5This tracttract 014122Ruskin: 2.32.3Ruskinparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 62

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 137Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 8.05%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.0%Peak (2016)
  • 31Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 120570141222000: 6 filings (9.54/100 renter HHs)2001: 1 filings (1.59/100 renter HHs)2002: 5 filings (7.95/100 renter HHs)2003: 16 filings (25.43/100 renter HHs)2004: 12 filings (19.07/100 renter HHs)2005: 10 filings (5.27/100 renter HHs)2009: 9 filings (4.75/100 renter HHs)2010: 13 filings (2.77/100 renter HHs)2011: 10 filings (2.12/100 renter HHs)2015: 24 filings (5.08/100 renter HHs)2016: 31 filings (5.00/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 417% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 471Total filings 2020-21
  • 6.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.86×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2020-09-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 5 filings (1.43× baseline)2021-03-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-05-01: 5 filings (1.43× baseline)2021-06-01: 6 filings (1.71× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2021-08-01: 4 filings (1.23× baseline)2021-09-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (1.14× baseline)2021-12-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-01-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-02-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2022-04-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2022-07-01: 5 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-08-01: 9 filings (2.77× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2022-10-01: 10 filings (3.08× baseline)2022-11-01: 7 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-01-01: 9 filings (2.25× baseline)2023-02-01: 7 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 4 filings (1.45× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-05-01: 7 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 5 filings (1.43× baseline)2023-07-01: 12 filings (3.20× baseline)2023-08-01: 7 filings (2.15× baseline)2023-09-01: 13 filings (2.60× baseline)2023-10-01: 12 filings (3.69× baseline)2023-11-01: 8 filings (4.57× baseline)2023-12-01: 15 filings (3.75× baseline)2024-01-01: 8 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 14 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 7 filings (2.55× baseline)2024-04-01: 10 filings (2.50× baseline)2024-05-01: 7 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 11 filings (3.14× baseline)2024-07-01: 17 filings (4.53× baseline)2024-08-01: 5 filings (1.54× baseline)2024-09-01: 17 filings (3.40× baseline)2024-10-01: 10 filings (3.08× baseline)2024-11-01: 12 filings (6.86× baseline)2024-12-01: 8 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 9 filings (2.25× baseline)2025-02-01: 11 filings (3.14× baseline)2025-03-01: 8 filings (2.91× baseline)2025-04-01: 13 filings (3.25× baseline)2025-05-01: 17 filings (4.86× baseline)2025-06-01: 12 filings (3.43× baseline)2025-07-01: 12 filings (3.20× baseline)2025-08-01: 9 filings (2.77× baseline)2025-09-01: 19 filings (3.80× baseline)2025-10-01: 12 filings (3.69× baseline)2025-11-01: 5 filings (2.86× baseline)2025-12-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Ruskin

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 7.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Ruskin, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Hillsborough County average of 5.1 and above the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is Black and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 62nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.86x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, above pre-pandemic levels.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 12057014122

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057014122?

Census tract 12057014122 in Ruskin scores 2.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12057014122?

Median gross rent is $1,677/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12057014122?

6.9% of residents in tract 12057014122 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 8,334.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12057014122?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 62th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 52th, household 82th, minority 80th, housing 39th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12057014122?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 137 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 12057014122 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.05% of renter households, peaking at 5.0% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 12057014122 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.86× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 12057014122 compare to Ruskin overall?

Tract 12057014122 scores 2.5/10, right in line with the parent city of Ruskin at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Ruskin; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Ruskin

Top eight tracts in Ruskin ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related