Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #41,065 of 84,120 nationally

Altos Verdes Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tampa

Tract 12057000800 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 4,090 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Census tract 12057000800 runs through Altos Verdes in Tampa. With 4,090 residents, it scores 4.7/10 for landlords. That is riskier than about 30% of US census tracts.

About 52% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 24% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,409 a month while the average household earns $63,968 a year, roughly 26% of income at the averages. About 34% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18% Stable renters 16% Owners 66%
Tract context
Occupied units1,344
Renter share33.9%
SVI overall0.83
Poverty rate11.8%
Median income$63,968

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 9 tracts In Altos Verdes
Very Low
Within parent city
47 th percentile
Rank, 47th percentileLowHigh
#56 of 104 tracts In Tampa
Moderate
Within county
62 th percentile
Rank, 62nd percentileLowHigh
#127 of 333 tracts In Hillsborough
Elevated
Within state
68 th percentile
Rank, 68th percentileLowHigh
#1,651 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tampa and the region

Centroid at 28.0272, -82.4357 · click any tract to drill in

Why Altos Verdes scores 4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tampa
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
11.8% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$1,409 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tampa
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tampa
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tampa
3.5

How Altos Verdes compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Altos Verdes risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.04.0This tracttract 000800Tampa: 2.72.7Tampaparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 83

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 905Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 18.81%Avg annual filing rate
  • 20.0%Peak (2015)
  • 89Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 120570008002000: 62 filings (13.22/100 renter HHs)2001: 91 filings (19.40/100 renter HHs)2002: 96 filings (20.47/100 renter HHs)2003: 75 filings (15.99/100 renter HHs)2004: 53 filings (11.30/100 renter HHs)2005: 80 filings (27.12/100 renter HHs)2009: 88 filings (29.83/100 renter HHs)2010: 75 filings (17.86/100 renter HHs)2011: 91 filings (17.30/100 renter HHs)2015: 105 filings (19.96/100 renter HHs)2016: 89 filings (14.42/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 44% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 311Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 5.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.80×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 5 filings (0.87× baseline)2020-02-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-03-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2020-04-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2020-05-01: 6 filings (1.26× baseline)2020-06-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2020-07-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2020-08-01: 4 filings (0.55× baseline)2020-09-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2020-10-01: 5 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2020-12-01: 8 filings (1.28× baseline)2021-01-01: 3 filings (0.52× baseline)2021-02-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2021-04-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (0.55× baseline)2021-07-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2021-08-01: 8 filings (1.10× baseline)2021-09-01: 5 filings (1.05× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (0.48× baseline)2021-11-01: 3 filings (0.55× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (0.70× baseline)2022-02-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-03-01: 4 filings (0.76× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2022-05-01: 5 filings (1.05× baseline)2022-06-01: 3 filings (0.55× baseline)2022-07-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2022-08-01: 6 filings (0.83× baseline)2022-09-01: 8 filings (1.68× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2022-11-01: 7 filings (1.27× baseline)2022-12-01: 9 filings (1.44× baseline)2023-01-01: 10 filings (1.74× baseline)2023-02-01: 8 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-03-01: 6 filings (1.14× baseline)2023-04-01: 7 filings (2.55× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2023-06-01: 8 filings (1.45× baseline)2023-07-01: 10 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (0.55× baseline)2023-09-01: 6 filings (1.26× baseline)2023-10-01: 11 filings (1.76× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (0.48× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2024-02-01: 5 filings (0.83× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2024-05-01: 5 filings (1.05× baseline)2024-06-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2024-07-01: 8 filings (1.60× baseline)2024-08-01: 16 filings (2.21× baseline)2024-09-01: 3 filings (0.63× baseline)2024-10-01: 8 filings (1.28× baseline)2024-11-01: 3 filings (0.55× baseline)2024-12-01: 4 filings (0.64× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2025-04-01: 6 filings (2.18× baseline)2025-05-01: 3 filings (0.63× baseline)2025-06-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.28× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (0.63× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.16× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 3 filings (0.48× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Altos Verdes. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Altos Verdes

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tampa eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hillsborough County average of 5.1 and in line with the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 905 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 18.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 20.0% of renter households in 2015.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 12057000800

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057000800?

Census tract 12057000800 in the Altos Verdes neighborhood scores 4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12057000800?

Median gross rent is $1,409/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12057000800?

11.8% of residents in tract 12057000800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,090.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12057000800?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 83th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 88th, household 87th, minority 85th, housing 44th.
Q5

Is tract 12057000800 considered part of Altos Verdes?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057000800 fall within Altos Verdes (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12057000800?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 905 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 12057000800 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 18.81% of renter households, peaking at 20.0% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 12057000800 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.80× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 12057000800 compare to Tampa overall?

Tract 12057000800 scores 4/10, higher than the parent city of Tampa at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tampa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 12057000800 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tampa

Top eight tracts in Tampa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related