Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #61,558 of 84,120 nationally

White Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 13015960104 · Bartow County, GA · pop 2,677 · 29% of tract blocks fall in White

With a score of 3.3/10, tract 13015960104 in White, GA reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,677. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.2/10.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 12% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,009
Renter share21.6%
SVI overall0.60
Poverty rate4.2%
Median income$71,250

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In White
Moderate
Within county
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#16 of 28 tracts In Bartow County
Moderate
Within state
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#1,865 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Low
National
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#61,558 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across White and the region

Centroid at 34.2882, -84.7104 · click any tract to drill in

Why White scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from White
3.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
4.2% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$1,179 rent vs county FMR
1.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from White
3.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from White
8.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from White
2.9

How White compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
White risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.3This tracttract 9601043.7Whiteparent city3.8Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 60

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in White

On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.1/10. At $1,179 a month, rents run 32% over what the rest of White commands.

Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.4/10. 46% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, above the Bartow County average of 41.0%.

That is riskier than roughly 27% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 22% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 6.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the GA average is 4.2, so this tract runs 0.9 points cooler. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

It tracks the Bartow County average of 3.8 closely. Annual rent works out to 20% of average household income of $71,250.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 13015960104

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13015960104?

Census tract 13015960104 in White scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13015960104?

Median gross rent is $1,179/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13015960104?

4.2% of residents in tract 13015960104 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,677.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13015960104?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 60th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 71th, household 73th, minority 15th, housing 42th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 13015960104 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 13015960104 compare to White overall?

Tract 13015960104 scores 3.3/10, lower than the parent city of White at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from White; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related