Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #44,239 of 84,120 nationally

Ringgold Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 13047030202 · Catoosa County, GA · pop 6,252 · 18% of tract blocks fall in Ringgold

Tract 13047030202 sits in Ringgold, GA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.3/10. It is home to 6,252 residents. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.1/10.

Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 10% Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units2,453
Renter share15.0%
SVI overall0.41
Poverty rate12.0%
Median income$77,252

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#2 of 7 tracts In Ringgold
High
Within county
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 15 tracts In Catoosa County
Elevated
Within state
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#1,146 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Elevated
National
47 th percentile
Rank, 47th percentileLowHigh
#44,239 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Ringgold and the region

Centroid at 34.9572, -85.1202 · click any tract to drill in

Why Ringgold scores 4.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Ringgold
3.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.2
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
12.0% poverty · this tract
3.0
Supply constraint
$692 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Ringgold
6.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Ringgold
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Ringgold
5.7

How Ringgold compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Ringgold risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.34.3This tracttract 030202Ringgold: 4.04.0Ringgoldparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.24.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 41

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 869Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 20.34%Avg annual filing rate
  • 29.8%Peak (2007)
  • 61Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2005 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130470302022005: 102 filings (27.65/100 renter HHs)2006: 90 filings (24.40/100 renter HHs)2007: 110 filings (29.82/100 renter HHs)2008: 109 filings (29.55/100 renter HHs)2009: 56 filings (15.18/100 renter HHs)2010: 91 filings (18.65/100 renter HHs)2011: 68 filings (17.17/100 renter HHs)2012: 61 filings (15.40/100 renter HHs)2013: 68 filings (17.17/100 renter HHs)2014: 53 filings (13.38/100 renter HHs)2015: 61 filings (15.40/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 40% over the past 11 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Ringgold

Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1/10. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.9/10.

At $692 a month, rents run 28% under what the rest of Ringgold commands. Against Catoosa County at 38.6%, 30% of renters here are cost-burdened. 11% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

The filing record is not thin: 869 evictions over 11 years of observation. Filings peaked in 2007 at 29.8% of renter households.

In a typical year about 20.3% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 47th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 15% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.7/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 11% of average household income of $77,252, an unusually wide affordability cushion. It tracks the Catoosa County average of 4.0 closely.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 13047030202

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13047030202?

Census tract 13047030202 in Ringgold scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13047030202?

Median gross rent is $692/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13047030202?

12.0% of residents in tract 13047030202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,252.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13047030202?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 33th, household 73th, minority 28th, housing 39th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13047030202?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 869 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13047030202 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 20.34% of renter households, peaking at 29.8% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 13047030202 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 13047030202 compare to Ringgold overall?

Tract 13047030202 scores 4.3/10, higher than the parent city of Ringgold at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Ringgold; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Ringgold

Top eight tracts in Ringgold ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related