Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #61,558 of 84,120 nationally

Ringgold Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 13047030304 · Catoosa County, GA · pop 4,236 · 2% of tract blocks fall in Ringgold

Census tract 13047030304 covers part of Ringgold, GA, and scores 3.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,236. Against Catoosa County at 38.6%, 5% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 10% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,326
Renter share10.4%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate5.0%
Median income$84,764

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 7 tracts In Ringgold
Very Low
Within county
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#12 of 15 tracts In Catoosa County
Low
Within state
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#1,865 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Low
National
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#61,558 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Ringgold and the region

Centroid at 34.8201, -85.1588 · click any tract to drill in

Why Ringgold scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Ringgold
3.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.2
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
5.0% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$1,053 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Ringgold
6.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Ringgold
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Ringgold
5.7

How Ringgold compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Ringgold risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.33.3This tracttract 030304Ringgold: 4.04.0Ringgoldparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.24.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 26

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 153Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 7.78%Avg annual filing rate
  • 19.3%Peak (2013)
  • 9Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2005 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130470303042005: 7 filings (2.16/100 renter HHs)2006: 11 filings (3.39/100 renter HHs)2007: 13 filings (4.00/100 renter HHs)2008: 12 filings (3.70/100 renter HHs)2009: 11 filings (3.39/100 renter HHs)2010: 15 filings (8.98/100 renter HHs)2011: 15 filings (10.71/100 renter HHs)2012: 25 filings (17.86/100 renter HHs)2013: 27 filings (19.29/100 renter HHs)2014: 8 filings (5.71/100 renter HHs)2015: 9 filings (6.43/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 29% over the past 11 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Ringgold

What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.1/10. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.9/10.

On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.3/10. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 153 filings here across 11 tracked years. It sits 0.7 points below the Catoosa County average of 4.0.

At $1,053 a month, rents run 10% over what the rest of Ringgold commands. The worst year on record was 2013, when 19.3% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 7.8% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 27% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 10% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

Social vulnerability reads 3.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Against average income of $84,764, annual rent is just 15%. Statewide the GA average is 4.2, so this tract runs 0.9 points cooler.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 13047030304

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13047030304?

Census tract 13047030304 in Ringgold scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13047030304?

Median gross rent is $1,053/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 5% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13047030304?

5.0% of residents in tract 13047030304 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,236.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13047030304?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 42th, household 40th, minority 3th, housing 22th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13047030304?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 153 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13047030304 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.78% of renter households, peaking at 19.3% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 13047030304 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 13047030304 compare to Ringgold overall?

Tract 13047030304 scores 3.3/10, lower than the parent city of Ringgold at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Ringgold; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Ringgold

Top eight tracts in Ringgold ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related