Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #29,336 of 84,120 nationally

Hickory Hills Eviction Risk: Moderate , Forest Park

Tract 13063040414 · Clayton County, GA · pop 1,501 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Census tract 13063040414 covers part of the Hickory Hills area of Forest Park, GA, and scores 5.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. Cost burden runs 32% here against 53.3% across Clayton County.

Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 46% Owners 33%
Tract context
Occupied units573
Renter share67.4%
SVI overall0.93
Poverty rate24.5%
Median income$59,519

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Hickory Hills
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 7 tracts In Forest Park
Moderate
Within county
68 th percentile
Rank, 68th percentileLowHigh
#23 of 70 tracts In Clayton County
Elevated
Within state
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#554 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Forest Park and the region

Centroid at 33.5862, -84.3746 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hickory Hills scores 5.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Forest Park
8.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
24.5% poverty · this tract
6.1
Supply constraint
$1,294 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Forest Park
7.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Forest Park
9.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Forest Park
7.2

How Hickory Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hickory Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.2This tracttract 0404144.5Forest Parkparent city4.4Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 93

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2,886Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 64.85%Avg annual filing rate
  • 114.2%Peak (2010)
  • 302Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 13063040414
Filings climbed 79% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 568Total filings 2020-21
  • 7.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hickory Hills

The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.9/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 9.7/10. Food insecurity runs 37.8% against 17.8% nationally.

Running hot, local political climate reads 8.7/10. Housing insecurity runs 30.2% against 14.2% nationally.

67% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. 18% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. The poverty rate is 25%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 2,886 filings here across 11 tracked years. It sits 0.8 points above the Clayton County average of 4.4. Filings peaked in 2010 at 114.2% of renter households.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 13063040414

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040414?

Census tract 13063040414 in the Hickory Hills neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13063040414?

Median gross rent is $1,294/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040414?

24.5% of residents in tract 13063040414 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,501.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040414?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 93th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 90th, household 97th, minority 89th, housing 60th.
Q5

Is tract 13063040414 considered part of Hickory Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040414 fall within Hickory Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13063040414?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2,886 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13063040414 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 64.85% of renter households, peaking at 114.2% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13063040414 struggle to pay rent?

About 30.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 18.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13063040414 compare to Forest Park overall?

Tract 13063040414 scores 5.2/10, higher than the parent city of Forest Park at 4.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Forest Park eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Forest Park

Top eight tracts in Forest Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related