Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #32,735 of 84,120 nationally

Forest Park Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 13063040202 · Clayton County, GA · pop 2,848 · 3% of tract blocks fall in Forest Park

The Elevated-tier score of 6.8/10 for census tract 13063040202 reflects conditions in Forest Park in Clayton County, Georgia. On the national scale it ranks #6,653 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 59% of renter households, a severe level, and 48% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,212 monthly, set against $47,946 in average yearly household income, roughly 30% of income at the averages. About 60% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 35% Stable renters 25% Owners 40%
Tract context
Occupied units972
Renter share59.7%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate14.5%
Median income$47,946

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#5 of 7 tracts In Forest Park
Low
Within county
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#29 of 70 tracts In Clayton County
Elevated
Within state
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#864 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Elevated
National
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#32,735 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Forest Park and the region

Centroid at 33.6143, -84.4155 · click any tract to drill in

Why Forest Park scores 4.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Forest Park
8.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
14.5% poverty · this tract
3.6
Supply constraint
$1,212 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Forest Park
7.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Forest Park
9.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Forest Park
7.2

How Forest Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Forest Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.54.5This tracttract 040202Forest Park: 2.82.8Forest Parkparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 94

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 3,311Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 45.92%Avg annual filing rate
  • 47.7%Peak (2007)
  • 303Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130630402022002: 309 filings (35.85/100 renter HHs)2005: 322 filings (43.05/100 renter HHs)2007: 357 filings (47.73/100 renter HHs)2008: 355 filings (47.46/100 renter HHs)2010: 249 filings (48.63/100 renter HHs)2011: 305 filings (50.25/100 renter HHs)2012: 305 filings (50.25/100 renter HHs)2013: 275 filings (45.30/100 renter HHs)2014: 258 filings (42.50/100 renter HHs)2015: 273 filings (44.98/100 renter HHs)2016: 303 filings (49.11/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,365Total filings 2020-21
  • 18.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 45 filings (450.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 33 filings (330.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 43 filings (430.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 52 filings (520.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 42 filings (420.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Forest Park

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 9.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Forest Park eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Clayton County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 3,311 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 45.9% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 47.7% of renter households in 2007.

In CDC survey modeling, about 31.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 21.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13063040202

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040202?

Census tract 13063040202 in Forest Park scores 4.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13063040202?

Median gross rent is $1,212/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040202?

14.5% of residents in tract 13063040202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,848.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040202?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 91th, household 82th, minority 97th, housing 88th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13063040202?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 3,311 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13063040202 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 45.92% of renter households, peaking at 47.7% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 13063040202 struggle to pay rent?

About 31.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 21.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 13063040202 compare to Forest Park overall?

Tract 13063040202 scores 4.5/10, higher than the parent city of Forest Park at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Forest Park eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Forest Park

Top eight tracts in Forest Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related