Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #15,522 of 84,120 nationally

Paradise Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lake City

Tract 13063040419 · Clayton County, GA · pop 7,603 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Census tract 13063040419 sits in the Paradise Park neighborhood of Lake City, Georgia eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 7.1/10. That is riskier than about 96% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 69% of renter households, a severe level, and 46% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,314 a month while the average household earns $41,489 a year, roughly 38% of income at the averages. Renters make up 72% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 50% Stable renters 22% Owners 28%
Tract context
Occupied units2,284
Renter share71.7%
SVI overall0.98
Poverty rate29.2%
Median income$41,489

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Paradise Park
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 6 tracts In Lake City
Very High
Within county
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 70 tracts In Clayton County
Very High
Within state
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#284 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lake City and the region

Centroid at 33.5892, -84.3272 · click any tract to drill in

Why Paradise Park scores 5.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lake City
8.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
29.2% poverty · this tract
7.3
Supply constraint
$1,314 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lake City
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lake City
9.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lake City
7.0

How Paradise Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Paradise Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.75.7This tracttract 040419Lake City: 2.72.7Lake Cityparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 98

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 2,252Total filings 2020-21
  • 29.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 54 filings (540.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 46 filings (460.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 54 filings (540.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 43 filings (430.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 34 filings (340.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 58 filings (580.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 34 filings (340.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 58 filings (580.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 60 filings (600.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 34 filings (340.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 49 filings (490.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 46 filings (460.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 50 filings (500.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 44 filings (440.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 45 filings (450.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 38 filings (380.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 54 filings (540.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 42 filings (420.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 43 filings (430.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 48 filings (480.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 45 filings (450.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 84 filings (840.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 56 filings (560.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 44 filings (440.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 64 filings (640.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 50 filings (500.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 50 filings (500.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 37 filings (370.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Paradise Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Paradise Park

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lake City, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Clayton County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 98th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 28.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 20.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13063040419

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040419?

Census tract 13063040419 in the Paradise Park neighborhood scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13063040419?

Median gross rent is $1,314/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 69% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040419?

29.2% of residents in tract 13063040419 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,603.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040419?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 98th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 91th, minority 91th, housing 94th.
Q5

Is tract 13063040419 considered part of Paradise Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040419 fall within Paradise Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 13063040419 struggle to pay rent?

About 28.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 20.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 13063040419 compare to Lake City overall?

Tract 13063040419 scores 5.7/10, higher than the parent city of Lake City at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lake City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lake City

Top eight tracts in Lake City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related