Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #57,812 of 84,120 nationally

Shangri-La on the Lake Eviction Risk: Lower , Riverdale

Tract 13063040513 · Clayton County, GA · pop 5,554 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

With a score of 3.5/10, tract 13063040513 in the Shangri-La on the Lake area of Riverdale, GA reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,554. Cost burden runs 86% here against 53.3% across Clayton County.

Risk score
3.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 2% Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units2,122
Renter share14.3%
SVI overall0.76
Poverty rate9.9%
Median income$54,639

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Shangri-La on the Lake
Moderate
Within parent city
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 12 tracts In Riverdale
Low
Within county
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#50 of 70 tracts In Clayton County
Low
Within state
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#1,701 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Riverdale and the region

Centroid at 33.5585, -84.4388 · click any tract to drill in

Why Shangri-La on the Lake scores 3.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Riverdale
8.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
9.9% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,643 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Riverdale
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Riverdale
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Riverdale
6.8

How Shangri-La on the Lake compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Shangri-La on the Lake risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.5This tracttract 0405134.0Riverdaleparent city4.4Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 76

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,090Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 31.77%Avg annual filing rate
  • 31.4%Peak (2012)
  • 89Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 13063040513
Filings climbed 82% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 490Total filings 2020-21
  • 6.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Shangri-La on the Lake

The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.9/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.9/10.

Set annual rent against average income of $54,639 and the ratio lands at 36%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. Running hot, local political climate reads 8.7/10. Food insecurity runs 33.7% against 17.8% nationally.

Housing insecurity runs 27.5% against 14.2% nationally. Average gross rent is $1,643, 21% above the Riverdale average.

The severe-burden share is 12%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. It sits 0.9 points below the Clayton County average of 4.4. The filing record is not thin: 1,090 evictions over 11 years of observation.

Filings peaked in 2012 at 31.4% of renter households.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 13063040513

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040513?

Census tract 13063040513 in the Shangri-La on the Lake neighborhood scores 3.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13063040513?

Median gross rent is $1,643/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 86% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040513?

9.9% of residents in tract 13063040513 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,554.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040513?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 76th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 80th, household 96th, minority 94th, housing 17th.
Q5

Is tract 13063040513 considered part of Shangri-La on the Lake?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040513 fall within Shangri-La on the Lake (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13063040513?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,090 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13063040513 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 31.77% of renter households, peaking at 31.4% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13063040513 struggle to pay rent?

About 27.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 19.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13063040513 compare to Riverdale overall?

Tract 13063040513 scores 3.5/10, lower than the parent city of Riverdale at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Riverdale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Riverdale

Top eight tracts in Riverdale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related