Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #41,065 of 84,120 nationally

Shangri-La on the Lake Eviction Risk: Moderate , Riverdale

Tract 13063040513 · Clayton County, GA · pop 5,554 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Tract 13063040513, home to 5,554 residents in the Shangri-La on the Lake neighborhood of Riverdale, scores 6.7/10 for landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #7,881 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 86% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 12% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,643 a month against an average household income of $54,639 a year, roughly 36% of income at the averages. About 14% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 2% Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units2,122
Renter share14.3%
SVI overall0.76
Poverty rate9.9%
Median income$54,639

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Shangri-La on the Lake
Moderate
Within parent city
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 12 tracts In Riverdale
Low
Within county
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#49 of 70 tracts In Clayton County
Low
Within state
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#1,155 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Riverdale and the region

Centroid at 33.5585, -84.4388 · click any tract to drill in

Why Shangri-La on the Lake scores 4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Riverdale
8.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
9.9% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,643 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Riverdale
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Riverdale
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Riverdale
6.8

How Shangri-La on the Lake compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Shangri-La on the Lake risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.04.0This tracttract 040513Riverdale: 2.62.6Riverdaleparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 76

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,090Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 31.77%Avg annual filing rate
  • 31.4%Peak (2012)
  • 89Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130630405132002: 49 filings (35.77/100 renter HHs)2005: 70 filings (31.67/100 renter HHs)2007: 94 filings (42.53/100 renter HHs)2008: 91 filings (41.18/100 renter HHs)2010: 108 filings (38.43/100 renter HHs)2011: 123 filings (29.08/100 renter HHs)2012: 133 filings (31.44/100 renter HHs)2013: 115 filings (27.19/100 renter HHs)2014: 116 filings (27.42/100 renter HHs)2015: 102 filings (24.11/100 renter HHs)2016: 89 filings (20.65/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 82% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 490Total filings 2020-21
  • 6.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Shangri-La on the Lake

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Riverdale, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Clayton County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,090 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 31.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 31.4% of renter households in 2012.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 76th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13063040513

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040513?

Census tract 13063040513 in the Shangri-La on the Lake neighborhood scores 4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13063040513?

Median gross rent is $1,643/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 86% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040513?

9.9% of residents in tract 13063040513 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,554.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040513?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 76th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 80th, household 96th, minority 94th, housing 17th.
Q5

Is tract 13063040513 considered part of Shangri-La on the Lake?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040513 fall within Shangri-La on the Lake (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13063040513?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,090 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13063040513 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 31.77% of renter households, peaking at 31.4% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13063040513 struggle to pay rent?

About 27.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 19.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13063040513 compare to Riverdale overall?

Tract 13063040513 scores 4/10, higher than the parent city of Riverdale at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Riverdale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Riverdale

Top eight tracts in Riverdale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related